Response to Referee Comments

Abstract

kindly note that was hard for the present Reviewer following if authors have fully answered to his questions. Additionally, for some of the previous required comments authors "simply" ignored it. Additionally, they decided to follow a strange way to respond to my general and specific questions, i.e, by simply using a discursive strategy. This is not a "conventional" way for a revised version of a major revision affected paper. So, for your convenience, and in order to avoid a rejection proposal of your paper, I warmly suggest authors using the following scheme: Comments X: report here one of my 31 comments, chronologically listed from 1 to 31