2003
DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to the letter of Walach et al. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 206, 139 – 141 (2003)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have shown that a considerable part of the Hg in saliva is present as amalgam particles [18], and that Hg levels in saliva do not correlate with concentrations in blood and urine [19].…”
Section: Mercury In Saliva Obtained During ''Chewing'' Of Smokeless Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have shown that a considerable part of the Hg in saliva is present as amalgam particles [18], and that Hg levels in saliva do not correlate with concentrations in blood and urine [19].…”
Section: Mercury In Saliva Obtained During ''Chewing'' Of Smokeless Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported a significant association of Hg and Se in maternal and umbilical cord blood but not in placenta tissue. Zimmer and colleagues 159 used CVAAS to determine concentrations of Hg in blood, urine and saliva in one group of women who had selfreported ill health effects arising from amalgam fillings ('amalgam sensitive' subjects) and a second control group with no reported ill health effects. Median blood and urine Hg levels in the 'amalgam sensitive' group were 2.35 mg l 21 and 1.55 mg l 21 , respectively, compared with values of 2.4 mg l 21 and 1.8 mg l 21 in the control group.…”
Section: Marine and Freshwater Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%