1993
DOI: 10.1016/0146-6410(93)90053-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to the report of the transfermium working group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TWG issued its report 16 in 1992. The contents of the report were accepted, in general, by the Dubna 71 and Darmstadt 72 laboratories, but heavily criticized by the Berkeley group. 73 A concise summary of the developments concerning the discovery of elements 101−111 was published by Greenwood.…”
Section: Transactinidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TWG issued its report 16 in 1992. The contents of the report were accepted, in general, by the Dubna 71 and Darmstadt 72 laboratories, but heavily criticized by the Berkeley group. 73 A concise summary of the developments concerning the discovery of elements 101−111 was published by Greenwood.…”
Section: Transactinidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A report of their extensive work was published by Barber et al (1992) and names were recommended on the basis of this report for the elements 101 to 109 (IUPAC 1994). The proposed list, although attempting to find a compromise, was not accepted in all details by the research groups in Berkeley, Dubna and Darmstadt (Ghiorso and Seaborg 1993, Oganessian and Zvara 1993, Armbruster et al 1993. As a consequence, a new list was created and accepted at the IUPAC General Assembly in August 1997 (IUPAC 1997).…”
Section: History and Names: The Elements Up To Meitneriummentioning
confidence: 99%