2008
DOI: 10.2308/acch.2008.22.2.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to the SEC Release: Acceptance from Foreign Private Issuers of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards without Reconciliation To U.S. GAAP File No. S7–13–07

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8, No. 11;2015 reporting information more comparable (Hopkins et al, 2008). Therefore, the need of foreign issuers to voluntarily choose to incorporate IFRS decreases (Kang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Consequences Of Ifrs Adoption: Foreign Issuersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, No. 11;2015 reporting information more comparable (Hopkins et al, 2008). Therefore, the need of foreign issuers to voluntarily choose to incorporate IFRS decreases (Kang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Consequences Of Ifrs Adoption: Foreign Issuersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the initial proposal to accept financial statements prepared under IFRS by foreign private issuers without reconciliation to U.S. GAAP, a committee of the American Accounting Association (AAA) reviewed the relevant literature in order to render an opinion regarding the propriety of the draft That committee concluded that the elimination of the reconciliation requirement was premature. They argued that failing to require the reconciliation would reduce comparability while significant convergence and compliance issues remain (Hopkins et al, 2008).…”
Section: Background Perspective and Recent Eventsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proposal received many responses from academia and professionals. Hopkins et al (2008, 227, 238) argued that “the reconciliation provides information incrementally useful to U.S. investors” and that “the elimination of the U.S. GAAP‐IFRS reconciliation requirement was premature.” Conversely, Jamal et al (2008, 246) argued that IFRS and U.S. GAAP both have high quality and “it is unlikely that the reconciliation schedule would provide useful information to investors.” Despite controversy, the SEC issued a final rule in December 2007 to eliminate the reconciliation (SEC 2007c). In this final rule, a foreign firm listed in the United States could prepare financial statements under IFRS as issued by the IASB without reconciliation on or after March 4, 2008, or earlier if the firm consulted with the SEC.…”
Section: Prior Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%