2008
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.53.6.1300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to the slug injection of a tracer—a large-scale experiment in a natural river / Réponse à l'injection impulsionnelle d'un traceur—expérience à grande échelle en rivière naturelle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal dispersion coefficients were determined with a passive tracer (NaCl). The tracer dispersion in the far‐field downstream of an instant‐tracer injection was measured at the up‐ and downstream longitudinal positions along the reaches following common procedures for tracer experiments in rivers and streams [ Domenico and Schwartz , ; Leibundgut et al ., ; Rowinski et al ., ]. The electrical conductivity was monitored at both sites using conductivity sensors (TetraCon 925, Wissenschaftlich Technische Werkstätten) following a NaCl slug injections of mass m .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Longitudinal dispersion coefficients were determined with a passive tracer (NaCl). The tracer dispersion in the far‐field downstream of an instant‐tracer injection was measured at the up‐ and downstream longitudinal positions along the reaches following common procedures for tracer experiments in rivers and streams [ Domenico and Schwartz , ; Leibundgut et al ., ; Rowinski et al ., ]. The electrical conductivity was monitored at both sites using conductivity sensors (TetraCon 925, Wissenschaftlich Technische Werkstätten) following a NaCl slug injections of mass m .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal dispersion coefficients were determined with a passive tracer (NaCl). The tracer dispersion in the far-field downstream of an instant-tracer injection was measured at the up-and downstream longitudinal positions along the reaches following common procedures for tracer experiments in rivers and streams [Domenico and Schwartz, 1998;Leibundgut et al, 2011;Rowinski et al, 2008]. The electrical conductivity was monitored at both sites using conductivity sensors (TetraCon 925, Wissenschaftlich Technische Werkst€ atten) following a NaCl slug injections of mass m. To verify that vertical and lateral gradients of the tracer distribution were negligible and that transport and mixing can be described by the longitudinal advection-dispersion equation, electrical conductivity at the upstream cross section was simultaneously measured close to the left-and right-bank as well as close to the centerline [Rutherford, 1994].…”
Section: Flow Resistance and Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows that the tests were conducted in the reach of Point 16 (injection point) to Point 20 (monitoring point). A fluorescent dye, Rhodamine WT, was used as a tracer material, which is a widelyused conservative tracer [43,[71][72][73]. In Test 1 and Test 2, 15 and 7.5 L, respectively, of 20% Rhodamine WT solution were injected.…”
Section: Study Site and Field Tracer Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best way of estimating the dispersion coefficients for the actual river is a tracer experiment, but usually in practical applications -since such an experiment is expensive and time consuming -impossible to be carried out. Moreover, the practice shows that tracer tests are feasible in one-dimensional situations only and they allow for the determination of just the longitudinal dispersion coefficients (Deng et al, 2001(Deng et al, , 2002Guymer, 1998;Kumar and Dalal, 2010;Rowiński et al, 2008;Sukhodolov et al, 1998). In cases when such tracer tests are not available, reliable estimation of dispersion coefficients becomes extremely difficult and can be a source of large uncertainty.…”
Section: Dispersion Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%