2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Todd, De Groot, Mose, McCauley and Heffron's critique of “Examining energy sufficiency and energy mobility in the global south through the energy justice framework”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lacey-Barnacle et al [54] was the first systematic review paper done looking at energy transition in the developing world, for which the authors outlined the fundamental core and theoretical frameworks for energy justice originated from the work done in developed countries. Monyei et al [55] outlined a clear demarcation of energy justice between the developed northern countries and the underdeveloped southern countries. The authors argued that the developing countries are victims of 'energy poverty' and energy 'bullying,' which essentially displaces their domestic energy markets through the competitive market forces created by the developed countries.…”
Section: Energy Transition In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lacey-Barnacle et al [54] was the first systematic review paper done looking at energy transition in the developing world, for which the authors outlined the fundamental core and theoretical frameworks for energy justice originated from the work done in developed countries. Monyei et al [55] outlined a clear demarcation of energy justice between the developed northern countries and the underdeveloped southern countries. The authors argued that the developing countries are victims of 'energy poverty' and energy 'bullying,' which essentially displaces their domestic energy markets through the competitive market forces created by the developed countries.…”
Section: Energy Transition In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another argument in the literature looks at the responsibility of fossil fuel emissions being most prominent amongst developed countries with the impacts mostly felt by developing countries. Researchers have contentiously argued that the international organizations dealing with climate change are often funded and spearheaded by developed countries and advocate for energy transition to renewable energy globally while developed countries still maintain a high fossil-fuel use [43,55,61,88] Bridging the energy transition gap between developed and developing countries needs to be further explored especially given the sentiments of the World Energy Transition Outlook which highlighted the need for governments to fast-track the energy transition process in order to meet global carbon reduction targets. Further empirical work is needed on the policy gaps between developed and developing countries, the feasibility of implementing the policy practices of the developed countries in developing countries and understanding the risk bearing ability and injustices of developing countries to transition away from fossil fuels especially on their social and economic conditions [89][90][91][92] .…”
Section: Recommendations and Policy Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… For a productive debate around the concept of energy bullying see Boamah, 2020; Monyei et al., 2018, 2019; Todd et al., 2019. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%