2005
DOI: 10.2144/000112064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because input amount of amplified cDNA was equivalent across all samples, raw Ct values were inversely proportional to the levels of gene expression (Libus and Storchova, 2006). We chose this approach instead of normalization to housekeeping genes because of the potential for differential expression of such reference transcripts in disease versus control samples (Dheda et al, 2005; Wong and Medrano, 2005). A similar approach has recently been validated in which standardized DNA input amounts for qPCR were used (Bernard et al, 2009, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because input amount of amplified cDNA was equivalent across all samples, raw Ct values were inversely proportional to the levels of gene expression (Libus and Storchova, 2006). We chose this approach instead of normalization to housekeeping genes because of the potential for differential expression of such reference transcripts in disease versus control samples (Dheda et al, 2005; Wong and Medrano, 2005). A similar approach has recently been validated in which standardized DNA input amounts for qPCR were used (Bernard et al, 2009, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1 (NEAT1) is one such lncRNA and is over expressed in patients with human immunodeciency virus (HIV-1), 2 which is a serious and fatal worldwide immunodeciency disease. 5,6 So exploiting a rapid, accurate, sensitive and quantitative method for detecting NEAT1 is necessary. The level of NEAT1 expression reects whether the body's antiviral ability is strong or weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%