2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of bacterial and bacteriophage communities to long-term exposure to antimicrobial agents in wastewater treatment systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, Runella (5%), Dechloromonas (5%), Nitrospira (4%), Haliangium (4%), and Haliscomenobacter (3%) were identified as the most prevalent genera within the bacterial community. The importance of these five predominant genera, despite the existence of antimicrobial agents, points to possible resistance and their ability to develop in a community in which antibiotic-sensitive ones could have decreased, and this observation aligns with previous studies that have revealed similar findings [10,20]. Another genus found and notable in the BP reactor is Zoogloea (2%), and this group of bacteria is typically found in activated sludge and involved in the degradation of organic and inorganic compounds in wastewater [29].…”
Section: Interactions Between Bacteriophage and Indigenous Prokaryoti...supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, Runella (5%), Dechloromonas (5%), Nitrospira (4%), Haliangium (4%), and Haliscomenobacter (3%) were identified as the most prevalent genera within the bacterial community. The importance of these five predominant genera, despite the existence of antimicrobial agents, points to possible resistance and their ability to develop in a community in which antibiotic-sensitive ones could have decreased, and this observation aligns with previous studies that have revealed similar findings [10,20]. Another genus found and notable in the BP reactor is Zoogloea (2%), and this group of bacteria is typically found in activated sludge and involved in the degradation of organic and inorganic compounds in wastewater [29].…”
Section: Interactions Between Bacteriophage and Indigenous Prokaryoti...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Illumina sequencing provided comprehensive data about the microbial community structure, and indicated that the exposure to the combination of pyophage cocktail and antibiotics resulted in substantial alterations in the microbial community structure of the reactor sludge (Figure 2). At the phylum level, Proteobacteria accounted for 62% of the bacterial population, showing an increase due to the tolerance, while the second most abundant phylum Bacteroidetes has a ratio of 23% in the BP reactor with antimicrobials, similar to the previous study [20]. On the other hand, Firmicutes is known as the third predominant phylum in WWTPs [21].…”
Section: Interactions Between Bacteriophage and Indigenous Prokaryoti...supporting
confidence: 84%
“…They play a key role both in microbial ecology and microbial evolution, having the ability to alter the population dynamics within microbial communities and modify bacterial genomes through horizontal gene transfer [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. In biological WWTPs, phage concentrations are estimated to be approximately 10 8 –10 9 particles per milliliter [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], which is higher than many other ecosystems studied to date [ 6 , 10 ]. Studies have shown that some of phage agents can control the growth of E. coli in biological WWTPs [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis showed that Acinetobacter virus Abgy202141 had an icosahedron head (~59 nm) with a short tail (~23 nm) ( Figure 1B ). The underground sewage from residential areas contains abundant bacteria and phages, and it can serve as a preferred resource for phage isolations which survive on drug-resistant bacteria (Du et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%