1983
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90131-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of cells in the auditory cortex of awake squirrel monkeys to normal and reversed species-specific vocalizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that responsive ness of AC neurons to various sounds, ar tificial as well as isolated natural stimuli, is based mainly on their sensitivity to spe cific stimulus components defined by a short duration relative to the entire stimu lus duration, by relatively high intensity, and by specific spectral characteristics [Katsuki et al, 1962;Newman and Symmes, 1979;Creutzfeldt et al, 1980;Glass and Wollberg, 1982]. The similarity between the responsiveness to calls and llacs reported in the present paper sup ports that suggestion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been suggested that responsive ness of AC neurons to various sounds, ar tificial as well as isolated natural stimuli, is based mainly on their sensitivity to spe cific stimulus components defined by a short duration relative to the entire stimu lus duration, by relatively high intensity, and by specific spectral characteristics [Katsuki et al, 1962;Newman and Symmes, 1979;Creutzfeldt et al, 1980;Glass and Wollberg, 1982]. The similarity between the responsiveness to calls and llacs reported in the present paper sup ports that suggestion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Furthermore, the importance of using animal sounds is stressed by the question as to whether, during evolution, the auditory system was specialized for se lective responses to communication sounds of biological and survival import ance [Capranica. 1972], This suggestion has not been supported by recent behav ioral and electrophysiological studies, in dicating that biologically relevant sounds (e.g., species-specific calls) and artificial sounds (e.g., calls played back in reverse, or synthesized sounds) are similarly discriminable and effective in eliciting re sponses from auditory cortex [Hupfer et al, 1977;Creutzfeldtet a!., 1980;Glass and Wollberg, 1982;Wollberg and Glass, 1982]. However, animal sounds used in these studies and other relevant investigations typically were 'electronically edited' to separate the natural stimuli from the ongo ing recorded sounds to allow isolated presentation to the experimental animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…stimuli with the same spectral structure but a different temporal structure and lacking the natural behavioural meaning of these calls. Glass & Wollberg (1983) found in the awake squirrel monkey that the responsiveness of cells of both primary and secondary auditory cortices was not significantly different from calls or their timereversed versions; very few cells were found to show 'reversed responses' to the time-reversed vocalizations (Glass & Wollberg 1983). However, a more recent study in the anaesthetized common marmoset found that a majority of A1 neurons showed stronger responses to natural marmoset twitter calls than to their time-reversed version (Wang et al 1995).…”
Section: Are Conspecific Vocalizations Special?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are undoubtedly cells of high specificity that respond to complex signals (e.g., species-specific vocal calls, Glass & Wollberg, 1983), it is unlikely that cells exist that are specifically tuned to scales made of Shepard tones. Presumably, the use of Shepard scales as adaptation stimuli would fatigue a large number ofspectralmotion-specific cells that respond to different pitch ranges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%