1989
DOI: 10.1139/f89-189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Cod (Gadus morhua) and Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) to Baited Hooks in the Natural Environment

Abstract: The behaviour of cod (Gadus morhua) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) towards baited hooks was observed in the sea with underwater television. Both species exhibited a diel rhythm of feeding activity most pronounced in cod, with an increase at dawn and a decrease at dusk. The activity rhythm of cod changed from bimodal with peaks in the morning and afternoon in September, to unimodal in December. Haddock showed a less clear activity rhythm during daytime. Activity of fish decreased at high current velocit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we did not directly ob serve the behaviors of fishes in proximity to our sampling gear, time-of-capture data for great barracuda directly support the validity of our assumption in that great barracudas were not motivated to feed outside of their normal feeding times. Given this conclusion and the findings of Løkkeborg & Bjordal (1989), we assert our data reflect the natural feeding patterns of the shark species we examined and believe our assumption is valid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While we did not directly ob serve the behaviors of fishes in proximity to our sampling gear, time-of-capture data for great barracuda directly support the validity of our assumption in that great barracudas were not motivated to feed outside of their normal feeding times. Given this conclusion and the findings of Løkkeborg & Bjordal (1989), we assert our data reflect the natural feeding patterns of the shark species we examined and believe our assumption is valid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…While we did not directly ob serve the behaviors of fishes in proximity to our sampling gear, time-of-capture data for great barracuda directly support the validity of our assumption in that great barracudas were not motivated to feed outside of their normal feeding times. Given this conclusion and the findings of Løkkeborg & Bjordal (1989), we assert our data reflect the natural feeding patterns of the shark species we examined and believe our assumption is valid.It has been stated that to properly estimate the feeding chronology of a given shark species one must employ stomach content analyses where individual meal times are reconstructed using qualitative stateof-digestion scales (Wetherbee & Cortés 2004). While we agree that analyses of stomach contents provide valuable insight into the feeding chronology of sharks, we consider our methodology to be complimentary and, in some respects, more powerful.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the last 60 years, underwater video technology has been successfully applied to a wide variety of objectives (Cappo, 2010;Mallet & Pelletier, 2014), including the assessment of reef fishes (e.g., Gardner & Struthers, 2012;Harvey et al, 2012), sharks (Brooks et al, 2011), deep-water scavengers (Priede et al, 1990(Priede et al, , 1994, and epibenthic invertebrates (Stokesbury et al, 2004;Harris & Stokesbury, 2006); the survey of marine habitats (Koenig et al, 2005;Carbines & Cole, 2009); and the analysis of behavior in different taxa (e.g., Løkkeborg et al, 1989;Albert et al, 2003), among other uses. A wide variety of camera configurations (from single cameras to stereo-video) were used for these purposes, both mounted onto static tethered or remote frames (baited and non-baited underwater video stations) and attached to mobile devices (remotely operated vehicles or ROVs, sleds and drifting cameras) (Shortis et al, 2009a;Cappo, 2010;Mallet & Pelletier, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%