2015
DOI: 10.1656/045.022.0215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Female White-Tailed Deer Home-Ranges to Increased Resource Availability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the rainy season, there was a general decrease in daily activity (Figure 5a). This could be because greater resource availability during this season reduces the need for exploratory behavior for adequate forage (Crimmins et al 2015). Results also showed greater overlap and the same directionality in the activity of different groups during rainy season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…During the rainy season, there was a general decrease in daily activity (Figure 5a). This could be because greater resource availability during this season reduces the need for exploratory behavior for adequate forage (Crimmins et al 2015). Results also showed greater overlap and the same directionality in the activity of different groups during rainy season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Population density is often a major factor influencing homerange use in some mammals, whereby density reductions result in changes in home ranges (Tuyttens et al 2000). This may be due to survivors taking advantage of newly available resources (Wiggins et al 2010, Crimmins et al 2015, or due to the removal of dominant conspecifics that are constraining the use of resources (Efford et al 2000, Crimmins et al 2015. Many animals have been observed changing their home ranges following density reduction, including shifting or increasing their home-range size (Woodroffe et al 2006a, Wiggins et al 2010, Riordan et al 2011, Crimmins et al 2015, Schoeph et al 2015; however, other studies have not recorded any changes (McNulty et al 1997, Oyer andPorter 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%