Responses of fluke-infected and fluke-free cattle to experimental reinfection with Salmonella dublin

Aitken, Maureen M.; Jones, Phillip W.; Hall, G.A.; Hughes, D.L.; Brown, Grafton Tyler

doi:10.1016/s0034-5288(18)32535-9

Cited by 20 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Aitken and others (1980), studied the effect of experimentally induced distomatosis on the survival rate of rats infected intraperitoneally with Salmonella Dublin, and observed that the bacteria persisted for longer in the tissues and faeces of the fluke‐infected rats. They observed similar results in cattle affected by distomatosis and infected experimentally with S Dublin (Aitken and others 1981). Some parasitic infections in pigs can also affect the interaction between the host and bacterial pathogens, as in the case of Oesophagostomum species infection, which can prolong and intensify the excretion of Salmonella Typhimurium (Steenhard and others 2002); furthermore, Ascaris suum and Trichuris suis have been shown to act synergistically with Pasteurella multocida and Campylobacter species, respectively (Tjørnehøj and others 1992, Mansfield and others 2003).…”

supporting

confidence: 64%

Bacteria isolated from 25 hydatid cysts in sheep, cattle and goats

Ziino¹,

Giuffrida²,

Bilei

et al. 2009

Veterinary Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 64%

Bacteria isolated from 25 hydatid cysts in sheep, cattle and goats

Ziino¹,

Giuffrida²,

Bilei

et al. 2009

Veterinary Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, immune suppressive effects of F. hepatica are not confined to the host‐parasite relationship but likely have broader implications to the induction of type 1 immune responses necessary to mediate resistance (induced by infection or vaccination) to major coexisting pathogens. For example, cattle infected with F. hepatica were more susceptible to infections with Salmonella dublin and took longer to clear the bacteria than nonhelminth‐infected animals . Similarly, concurrent infection of mice with F. hepatica and Bordetella pertussis resulted in a prolonged bacterial lung infection .…”

Section: Altered Immune Homeostasis During Fasciola Infectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prospective view of animal and human Fasciolosis

Cwiklinski

O’Neill

Donnelly

et al. 2016

Parasite Immunology

171

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryFasciolosis, a food‐borne trematodiasis, results following infection with the parasites, Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica. These trematodes greatly affect the global agricultural community, infecting millions of ruminants worldwide and causing annual economic losses in excess of US $3 billion. Fasciolosis, an important zoonosis, is classified by WHO as a neglected tropical disease with an estimated 17 million people infected and a further 180 million people at risk of infection. The significant impact on agriculture and human health together with the increasing demand for animal‐derived food products to support global population growth demonstrate that fasciolosis is a major One Health problem. This review details the problematic issues surrounding fasciolosis control, including drug resistance, lack of diagnosis and the threat that hybridization of the Fasciola species poses to future animal and human health. We discuss how these parasites may mediate their long‐term survival through regulation and modulation of the host immune system, by altering the host immune homeostasis and/or by influencing the intestinal microbiome particularly in respect to concurrent infections with other pathogens. Large genome, transcriptome and proteomic data sets are now available to support an integrated One Health approach to develop novel diagnostic and control strategies for both animal and human disease.

show abstract

“…Apart from some general principles, the epidemiology of salmonellosis in cattle, and that of S Dublin in particular, is not well understood. Young cattle infected with the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica have been shown to be more susceptible to S Dublin infection, and infected animals excrete S Dublin for a longer period (Aitken and others 1981). Furthermore, S Dublin infections are more common on fluke‐infected farms (Watson and others 1971, Vaessen and others 1998, Anon 1999).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Salmonella infection in cattle in Great Britain, 2003 to 2008

Carrique-Mas¹,

Willmington

Papadopoulou³

et al. 2010

Veterinary Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surveillance data for clinical disease in cattle in Great Britain due to Salmonella infections were analysed for the period 2003 to 2008 in order to describe seasonality and to investigate possible associations between Salmonella diagnoses and other variables such as region, climate, age and production type. A clear seasonal pattern was shown for Salmonella infection, coinciding with the second half of the year. The incidence of Salmonella Dublin and Salmonella Typhimurium was highest in the west of the country, which has the greatest cattle density, but this was not a feature of diagnoses with other serovars. Abortion was a more common clinical sign of S Dublin infections, but was relatively unusual in the case of S Typhimurium. The observed clinical picture and age of affected animals were largely determined by the seasonality of dairy cattle calving in Great Britain.

show abstract

Responses of fluke-infected and fluke-free cattle to experimental reinfection with Salmonella dublin

Cited by 20 publications

References 11 publications

Bacteria isolated from 25 hydatid cysts in sheep, cattle and goats

Bacteria isolated from 25 hydatid cysts in sheep, cattle and goats

A prospective view of animal and human Fasciolosis

Salmonella infection in cattle in Great Britain, 2003 to 2008

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About