2002
DOI: 10.2307/3803127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Isolated Wetland Herpetofauna to Upland Forest Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small pools often form after loss of vegetation (from logging or fire) because decreased evapotranspiration results in elevated water tables and increased soil saturation (Shepard, 1994;Perison et al, 1997). In the Coastal Plain of South Carolina, removal of trees in a loblolly pine forest resulted in increased standing water and higher numbers of bronze frogs (Rana clamitans) in cleared versus reference (unharvested) stands (Russell et al, 2002a). Small isolated wetlands are particularly important amphibian habitats (Dodd, 1992;Semlitsch and Brodie, 1998;Russell et al 2002b) and their formation in burned forests may benefit some amphibians.…”
Section: Hydroperiodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small pools often form after loss of vegetation (from logging or fire) because decreased evapotranspiration results in elevated water tables and increased soil saturation (Shepard, 1994;Perison et al, 1997). In the Coastal Plain of South Carolina, removal of trees in a loblolly pine forest resulted in increased standing water and higher numbers of bronze frogs (Rana clamitans) in cleared versus reference (unharvested) stands (Russell et al, 2002a). Small isolated wetlands are particularly important amphibian habitats (Dodd, 1992;Semlitsch and Brodie, 1998;Russell et al 2002b) and their formation in burned forests may benefit some amphibians.…”
Section: Hydroperiodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mole salamanders (Ambystoma talpoideum) in South Carolina reportedly may be able to maintain themselves in clearcut areas as long as there is sufficient cover in the form of coarse woody debris (CWD) or leaf litter (Chazal and Niewiarowski 1998). Russell et al (2002b) found only temporary declines in abundance of both snakes and turtles in clearcut and site-prepared stands adjacent to small ponds on Coastal Plain industrial pine forests; other herpetofaunal groups were either unaffected, or, in the case of bronze frogs (Rana clamitans clamitans), may have benefited from treatment. These studies, while encouraging, do not yet represent a broad consensus of opinion.…”
Section: Wildlife Relationships With Isolated Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russell et al (2002b) Divided area surrounding wetlands into clearcut, clearcut with site preparation, and reference stands. Herpetofaunal communities sampled before treatment and 0.5 years and 1.5 years post-treatment.…”
Section: Wildlife Relationships With Isolated Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attention has focused on reptiles, particularly on disturbance to nesting turtles and lizards (Schlaepfer 2003;Jessop and Hamann 2004;Moore and Seigel 2006), effects on basking or foraging reptiles (Burger 2001;Parent and Weatherhead 2000;Goldingay and Newell 2000), effects of roads (Garber and Burger 1995;Gibbs and Shriver 2002), effects of livestock on nesting reptiles (Homyack and Giuliano 2002;Semlitsch and Bodie 2003), and the effect of forest management on reptile assemblages (Brown 2001;Russell et al 2002). The lack of studies with snakes is largely because of their solitary or secretive nature and the difficulty of observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%