1998
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.5.r1543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of mesenteric and renal blood flow dynamics to acute denervation in anesthetized rats

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that renal autoregulation dynamically stabilizes renal blood flow (RBF). The role of renal nerves, particularly of a baroreflex component, in dynamic regulation of RBF remains unclear. The relative roles of autoregulation and mesenteric nerves in dynamic regulation of blood flow in the superior mesenteric artery (MBF) are similarly unclear. In this study, transfer function analysis was used to identify autoregulatory and baroreflex components in the dynamic regulation of RBF and MBF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
49
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
9
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exaggerated vasoconstriction by one of these agonists might explain the enhanced myogenic response during NOS inhibition. However, ANG II and catecholamines do not potentiate the myogenic response in the time domain (20,35) or the frequency domain (1,71,80) as markedly as that seen during NOS inhibition of NO production. On the other hand, O 2 Ϫ does enhance the myogenic response by an action independent of NO (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Exaggerated vasoconstriction by one of these agonists might explain the enhanced myogenic response during NOS inhibition. However, ANG II and catecholamines do not potentiate the myogenic response in the time domain (20,35) or the frequency domain (1,71,80) as markedly as that seen during NOS inhibition of NO production. On the other hand, O 2 Ϫ does enhance the myogenic response by an action independent of NO (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The reasons remain to be defined (45,54); however, vascular myogenic responses have been implicated in the generation and buffering of LF BP fluctuations (1,24,60,66). Of particular relevance, parallel differences between ANG II and PE were observed with respect to the fractional gain of the myogenic response in the renal transfer function data (see Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Teleologically, this could provide protection for the capillaries from rapid increases in pressure, which might be more important in the kidney than in skeletal muscle. The same consideration might apply to the mesenteric vasculature, where the myogenic response also seems to be faster than in muscular tissue (1). The fast response of the renal vessels does not seem to be an invariable feature, because other response times, more closely resembling the pattern in skeletal muscle arterioles, have also been observed in renal vessels (17,52).…”
Section: Comparison With Hindlimb Vasculaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although these temporal differences have been experimentally investigated by studying the renal and the mesenteric circulation (1) and discussed in a recent review (20), a direct comparison with other vascular beds to our knowledge has never been done, except for a cursory notion in the original work of Bayliss (5) and a step function analysis in artificially perfused organs (31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%