1956
DOI: 10.1017/s0007485300046988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Pests to Fumigation. VI.—Water Losses and the Mortality ofCalandraSpp. at reduced Pressures

Abstract: In Part IV of this series, El Nahal (1953) reviewed the evidence which shows that the amount of water lost by insects at reduced pressures is an important faetor contributing to the death of the insects. El Nahal further showed that the mortality of both Calandra oryzae (L.) and G. granaria (L.) increased with the exposure period (range 0-8 hr.) and temperature (range 20-28°C.) when the pressure was reduced to between 2 and 8 cm. mercury. Within this pressure range, C. oryzae was more susceptible than G. grana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have noted a reduction in weight due to moisture loss in vacuum-treated insects and that high humidities can reduce efÞcacy of vacuum treatments (El Nahal 1953, Bhambhani 1956, Chen et al 2006. Jay et al (1971) noted that mortality of stored product insects increased with decreasing relative humidity under low oxygen treatments at atmospheric pressures, and attributed this effect to dehydration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have noted a reduction in weight due to moisture loss in vacuum-treated insects and that high humidities can reduce efÞcacy of vacuum treatments (El Nahal 1953, Bhambhani 1956, Chen et al 2006. Jay et al (1971) noted that mortality of stored product insects increased with decreasing relative humidity under low oxygen treatments at atmospheric pressures, and attributed this effect to dehydration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mercury) sorption appeared to be reduced. This change has been discussed in more detail by Bhambhani (1956a). Pradhan & Bhatia (1951) measured both sorption of hydrogen cyanide and recovery of this fumigant from insects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There are two main types of circumstance that seem to give rise to departures from this working rule. In the first place, a given concentration-time product is much more effective at low pressures than at atmospheric pressure (Salmond, 1953; El Nahal, 1953a), a discrepancy which cannot be accounted for by the mortality that arises at low pressures in the absence of fumigant (El Nahal, 19536;Bhambhani, 1956a). El Nahal (1953c) found that hydrogen cyanide is sorbed more strongly on wheat in sacks if the fumigation is done at low pressures than at atmospheric pressure, even when full allowance is made for the greater concentration-time products obtained in the sustained vacuum fumigations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%