2015
DOI: 10.1111/wre.12191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of rare and common segetal species to wheat competition and fertiliser type and dose

Abstract: Fertiliser application is considered crucial for determining the crop-weed competition relationship by stimulating plant growth and modulating the competition for below-ground (soil nutrients) and above-ground resources (e.g. light and space). Segetal species, those preferentially inhabiting cereal fields, have suffered a strong decline, owing to agricultural intensification. Under continued pressure, particularly the rarest species may disappear. In this study, we aimed to assess the competitive ability of co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In nutrient‐rich arable fields, we expect a higher competitiveness of rye and lower crop yield losses caused by the rare arable plants (Rotchés‐Ribalta et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nutrient‐rich arable fields, we expect a higher competitiveness of rye and lower crop yield losses caused by the rare arable plants (Rotchés‐Ribalta et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although herbicides may be an important driver of RAP decline, they are not necessarily a direct cause of rarity for all species [ 10 ]. Moreover, for other factors such as crop competition and/or fertilizers not all rare segetal species respond in similar ways, which highlights that these factors alone are poor predictors of the rarity of RAP species [ 11 ], and others should also be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some instances, individuals of rare species characterized by relatively greater competitiveness may be able to compensate for reduced establishment by increased growth (Svensson and Wigren 1982;Kleijn and Van den Voort 1997). In contrast, in the absence of crops, introduced rare species generally benefit from additional fertilizer (Svensson and Wigren 1982;Kohler et al 2011;Rotchés-Ribalta et al 2016). However, some particularly uncompetitive rare species may fail to benefit from fertilizer even then, possibly due to being outcompeted by spontaneous non-crop species.…”
Section: Re-introduction Of Rare Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%