2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of soil fungal and archaeal communities to environmental factors in an ongoing antimony mine area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fungal species with biological control activity cooperated against the pathogenic fungal species (Shen et al, 2018). pH significantly affected the fungal community structure, which was similar to the results of soil fungal and archaeal community structures (Wang et al, 2019) and soil bacterial community structures (Wang et al, 2018b) in an ongoing antimony mine area. The pH of the grape juice was significantly positively correlated with the Shannon, Simpson, Chao1, and ACE indexes (Figure 8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The fungal species with biological control activity cooperated against the pathogenic fungal species (Shen et al, 2018). pH significantly affected the fungal community structure, which was similar to the results of soil fungal and archaeal community structures (Wang et al, 2019) and soil bacterial community structures (Wang et al, 2018b) in an ongoing antimony mine area. The pH of the grape juice was significantly positively correlated with the Shannon, Simpson, Chao1, and ACE indexes (Figure 8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Additionally, Granulicatella-whose relative abundance has been negatively associated with dental caries 16 -decreased in abundance with higher levels of antimony. A search for microbiome studies of antimony found only 14 studies (all in soil or water) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors affecting the distribution of soil archaea remain unknown (Huang et al 2019;Meng et al 2019;Shi et al 2016). Previous studies have suggested that the structure of archaeal community in desert soil may be shaped by a combination of soil physical properties, nutrient content, heavy metal disturbance, plant root action, and pollution (Nan et al 2020;Wang et al 2019;Wang et al 2011;Zhao et al 2020). In this study, the combined results of RDA analysis and VPA suggest that a combination of many environmental variables and anthropogenic disturbances determine the distribution patterns of archaeal community structure in desert soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%