2018
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/81086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Soil Microorganisms and Enzymatic Activities to Azoxystrobin in Cambisol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This variable results of two different treatment pairs on alkaline phosphatase might be explained by primarily different mechanisms that pesticide degradation products were responsible for inhibition to alkaline phosphatise (T2 as collated with T1) or the shift in the composition of the soil microbial community contributed to the increment in the activity of alkaline phosphatase related to phosphorous bio-availability (T4 as collated with T3) [40] . The stability of urease between two different treatment pairs might imply that this enzyme had not any role in the degradation pathway of the fungicides or no specific substrates in the currently contaminated soil ecosystems, which was similar to the results of Moreno et al [41] on the activities of soil urease affected by different concentration atrazine with different incubation time and Du et al [42] on the same enzyme activities affluenced by mesotrione of different doses at different time interval, but also there existed some cases on the variable activities of urease influenced by pesticides with different concentrations at different time points [43,44] . The higher activity of catalase for T4 attributed not only to the activity of soil microbial microflora, but also contribution of plant root stressed by pathogen Fusarium oxysporum, which help plant overcome the detrimental environment for surviving.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This variable results of two different treatment pairs on alkaline phosphatase might be explained by primarily different mechanisms that pesticide degradation products were responsible for inhibition to alkaline phosphatise (T2 as collated with T1) or the shift in the composition of the soil microbial community contributed to the increment in the activity of alkaline phosphatase related to phosphorous bio-availability (T4 as collated with T3) [40] . The stability of urease between two different treatment pairs might imply that this enzyme had not any role in the degradation pathway of the fungicides or no specific substrates in the currently contaminated soil ecosystems, which was similar to the results of Moreno et al [41] on the activities of soil urease affected by different concentration atrazine with different incubation time and Du et al [42] on the same enzyme activities affluenced by mesotrione of different doses at different time interval, but also there existed some cases on the variable activities of urease influenced by pesticides with different concentrations at different time points [43,44] . The higher activity of catalase for T4 attributed not only to the activity of soil microbial microflora, but also contribution of plant root stressed by pathogen Fusarium oxysporum, which help plant overcome the detrimental environment for surviving.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the spring time, a significant reduction in the abundance of both groups of microorganisms was probably the effect of herbicides [71], which were applied shortly before soil sampling. At full wheat vegetation, the abundance of bacteria showed a declining tendency, and the abundance of fungi was reduced following a fungicide treatment performed shortly before [72,73]. The reduction in the abundance of soil bacteria and fungi observed in our own studies was probably only short-term.…”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…While some studies reported azoxystrobin reduced microbial diversity by inhibiting the growth of a number of bacteria and fungi in soil, [64][65][66] particularly its target pathogens, Deuteromycetes, Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes and Oomycetes, 37 others have suggested that the fungicide had little to no significant effect on soil microbial communities. [67][68][69] Such contrasting conclusions are likely attributed to differences in the soil properties, fungicide doses and application methods used in each study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%