2018
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8120282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Soybean Dry Matter Production, Phosphorus Accumulation, and Seed Yield to Sowing Time under Relay Intercropping with Maize

Abstract: Soybean production under maize–soybean relay-intercropping system (MSICS) is vulnerable to shading. A study was initiated to investigate the effects of three sowing-times: ST1, 90; ST2, 70; and ST3, 50 days of co-growth period and two phosphorus-rates: P0, 0; and P60, 60 kg P ha−1 on soybean under MSICS. Results revealed that ST3 significantly increased the photosynthetically active radiations, leaf area index, and photosynthetic rate by 72% and 58%, and 61% and 38%, and 6% and 8%, respectively, at full-flower… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The planting time of soybean in MSRI not only influenced the growth, but it also affected the flowering time, and yield components (Table 2), our findings are consistent with the results of previous reports (Zhang et al, 2008). It is estimated that when maize and soybean co-growth duration increases from 50 days to 90 days, it significantly reduces the initial biomass of soybean (Ahmed et al, 2018), which at later stages considerably reduced the pods plant −1 , seed weight (g) and number of seeds plant −1 (Table 2), which in turn decreased the soybean seed yield in MSRI (Figure 4a,b), it might be due to the strong asymmetrical competition with maize for longer growth duration. Therefore, under MSRI, adjustments in the planting time of soybean can promote the growth and development of soybean plants, and by maintaining optimum co-growth duration, we can improve soybean biomass accumulation and seed yield by reducing the negative effects of maize shading on soybean plants.…”
Section: Plant Growth As Affected By Interspecific Interactionssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The planting time of soybean in MSRI not only influenced the growth, but it also affected the flowering time, and yield components (Table 2), our findings are consistent with the results of previous reports (Zhang et al, 2008). It is estimated that when maize and soybean co-growth duration increases from 50 days to 90 days, it significantly reduces the initial biomass of soybean (Ahmed et al, 2018), which at later stages considerably reduced the pods plant −1 , seed weight (g) and number of seeds plant −1 (Table 2), which in turn decreased the soybean seed yield in MSRI (Figure 4a,b), it might be due to the strong asymmetrical competition with maize for longer growth duration. Therefore, under MSRI, adjustments in the planting time of soybean can promote the growth and development of soybean plants, and by maintaining optimum co-growth duration, we can improve soybean biomass accumulation and seed yield by reducing the negative effects of maize shading on soybean plants.…”
Section: Plant Growth As Affected By Interspecific Interactionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In MSRI, when soybean emerges, the soybean seedlings come under maize shade and receive fever nutrients, light and water for its growth and development (Feng et al, 2019;Raza, Khalid, Zhang, Feng, et al, 2019). Thus, soybean grows abnormally because of strong aboveground competition from maize plants in MSRI ( Figure 5; Ahmed et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2017). In addition, the difference between the competitive abilities of soybean and maize in MSRI has been evident, and this competitive ability of intercrop species has changed with planting time due to the initial growth advantage of maize with changing planting time or with plant structure and size during the co-growth duration (Andersen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Plant Growth As Affected By Interspecific Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved photosynthetic characteristics are one of the major factors for biomass production (Raza et al, ). It had been described that TBA is directly related to PAR interception (Ahmed et al, ; Kiniry, Bean, Xie, & Chen, ). Differences in PAR interception changes the photosynthetic rate of maize plants and TBA, leaves at the middle strata or below the ear leaf being the major source of carbohydrates in maize (Maddonni & Otegui, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in PAR interception changes the photosynthetic rate of maize plants and TBA, leaves at the middle strata or below the ear leaf being the major source of carbohydrates in maize (Maddonni & Otegui, ). Thus, decrease in PAR interception at the middle strata leaves can decrease TBA in maize plants (Ahmed et al, ; T. Liu et al, ). Previous results proposed that an optimum leaf excision (T 2 ) from maize plants after silking stage (R 1 ) under SM and MS R can increase TBA, which in turn increases the availability of assimilates for grain production (T. Liu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the previous investigations, they examined the impacts of shading and light intensity on the yield parameters of sole‐cropped soybean (Feng et al, ; F. Yang et al, ). The soybean dry matter and yield in relay intercropping have been found to be lesser than sole‐cropped soybean (Ahmed et al, ). Therefore, it is important to evaluate an appropriate planting pattern (row spacing) which can enhance the resources efficiency in intercropping systems especially radiation use efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%