1976
DOI: 10.1136/gut.17.12.933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of the competent and incompetent lower oesophageal sphincter to pentagastrin and abdominal compression.

Abstract: The central role of the physiological lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) in the prevention of gastro-oesophageal reflux is now well recognised; and, in recent years, the effects upon resting LOS pressure of a number of hormones and drugs have been defined (Castell, 1975). However, the physiological means by which resting pressure within the LOS is maintained and modulated have not been fully elucidated; nor have the factors responsible for sphincteric incompetence, and therefore gastro-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our current study after the meal the belt caused a greater rise in the IGP than in LES pressure causing a significant fall in LES pressure relative to the IGP which is the pressure gradient preventing reflux. This fall in LES pressure relative to the IGP has been reported by some but not all investigators (5,7,8,9,10,11). The fall in LES pressure relative to the IGP in our current study was only apparent after the meal and involved patients with reflux disease and in these respects differed from previous studies.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our current study after the meal the belt caused a greater rise in the IGP than in LES pressure causing a significant fall in LES pressure relative to the IGP which is the pressure gradient preventing reflux. This fall in LES pressure relative to the IGP has been reported by some but not all investigators (5,7,8,9,10,11). The fall in LES pressure relative to the IGP in our current study was only apparent after the meal and involved patients with reflux disease and in these respects differed from previous studies.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Previous investigators have examined the effect of waist belt compression on the manometric characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in both healthy volunteers and patients with reflux disease. The rise in IGP caused by the waist belt is accompanied by a rise in LES pressure though sometimes of a lesser magnitude (5,7,8,9,10,11). Waist belt compression in short term studies does not result in the development of, or aggravation of, hiatus hernia or in increased separation of the intrinsic and extrinsic components of the LES (9,12,13).…”
Section: Background and Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was considered that the elevated intraesophageal pressure was not caused by a direct effect of the increase in the intraabdominal pressure through the esophagogastric junction but by the increase in the intrathoracic pressure following elevation of the diaphragm. Some authors reported that the increase in the LESP relative to the atmospheric pressure was higher than that of the intragastric pressure [10,11], whereas others reported that they were similar [12,13]. Controversy remains, but our report supports the latter contention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…There is no doubt that exogenous gastrin increases sphincter pressure (Giles et al, 1969;Cohen and Lipshutz, 1971;Trindade et al, 1975;Kaye et al, 1976) but the evidence that endogenous gastrin is a physiological determinant of sphincter pressure is less convincing (Grossman, 1973;Roszkowski et al, 1973;Farrell et al, 1974;McCall et al, 1975;Dodds et al, 1975a, b;Dent and Hansky, 1976). Central to the controversy is the methodology of LOS pressure measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%