2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of the macrobenthic community to the Dalian Bay oil spill based on co-occurrence patterns and interaction networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total set of Ediacaran data exhibits strong metacommunity structure, consistent with previous analyses that resolve multiple assemblages [ 7 9 ]. Both the total dataset and the individual assemblages have relatively low numbers of nonrandom co-occurrences (9.8% to 16.7%) compared to many extant analyses (e.g., 35% to 63% [ 60 , 61 ]) as well as terrestrial fossil communities (such as averaging 64% aggregated pairs from the Carboniferous to the Holocene, and 37% from the Holocene to the present [ 62 ], although percentages of nonrandom co-occurrences are similar to at least some extant benthic communities (16.3%) [ 63 ]. Previous spatial analyses of Avalonian communities have revealed limited interspecific interactions [ 11 , 14 ] and limited environmental associations between taxa within communities [ 12 ], so the large number of nonsignificant correlations within the Avalon assemblage are consistent with previous work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total set of Ediacaran data exhibits strong metacommunity structure, consistent with previous analyses that resolve multiple assemblages [ 7 9 ]. Both the total dataset and the individual assemblages have relatively low numbers of nonrandom co-occurrences (9.8% to 16.7%) compared to many extant analyses (e.g., 35% to 63% [ 60 , 61 ]) as well as terrestrial fossil communities (such as averaging 64% aggregated pairs from the Carboniferous to the Holocene, and 37% from the Holocene to the present [ 62 ], although percentages of nonrandom co-occurrences are similar to at least some extant benthic communities (16.3%) [ 63 ]. Previous spatial analyses of Avalonian communities have revealed limited interspecific interactions [ 11 , 14 ] and limited environmental associations between taxa within communities [ 12 ], so the large number of nonsignificant correlations within the Avalon assemblage are consistent with previous work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accurately determine the plant-plant interaction, such as facilitation or competition, a comparison experiment for plant richness between patches and cushions should have been conducted (Piper et al 2019). Moreover, co-occurrence analysis is based on plant presence/absence patterns, meaning that only the frequency in communities is calculated without counting the individual abundance (Gu et al 2021). Accordingly, to better understand the plant-plant interactions and co-occurrence patterns, precise experimentation, replicated studies across a wider range of species combinations, and analyses considering plant cover or abundance are necessary (Angers- Blondin et al 2018).…”
Section: Plant-species Co-occurrence Pattern and Richnessmentioning
confidence: 99%