2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10535-014-0465-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of two barley cultivars differing in their salt tolerance to moderate and high salinities and subsequent recovery

Abstract: Two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Czech spring cv. Amulet and Syrian landrace Tadmor, were subject to different salinity treatments: 1) the NaCl concentration was gradually increased from 0 (the control) to either 100 (a moderate salt stress) or 300 mM NaCl (a high salt stress), 2) the NaCl concentration was increased directly either from 0 to 300 mM NaCl or from 100 to 300 mM NaCl, and 3) a recovery when all variants were transferred back to control conditions and cultivated for seven additional days… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydroponical solution was changed every 3rd day in order to prevent nutrient depletion. All plants were first exposed to the control treatment of 0.2 mM NaCl (osmotic potential of the control solution ψ = -0.095 MPa) for 7 days similarly to previous publications ( Islam et al, 2007 ; Kosová et al, 2015 ) due to a halophytic nature of H. marinum . NaCl was added to the hydroponical solution every day in a gradually increasing manner by 50 mM NaCl up to the final concentrations of 100 mM NaCl (100; a moderate salt stress ψ = -0.608 MPa) and 300 mM NaCl (300; a high salt stress ψ = -1.64 MPa), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hydroponical solution was changed every 3rd day in order to prevent nutrient depletion. All plants were first exposed to the control treatment of 0.2 mM NaCl (osmotic potential of the control solution ψ = -0.095 MPa) for 7 days similarly to previous publications ( Islam et al, 2007 ; Kosová et al, 2015 ) due to a halophytic nature of H. marinum . NaCl was added to the hydroponical solution every day in a gradually increasing manner by 50 mM NaCl up to the final concentrations of 100 mM NaCl (100; a moderate salt stress ψ = -0.608 MPa) and 300 mM NaCl (300; a high salt stress ψ = -1.64 MPa), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of WSD, osmotic potential (ψ s ), proline accumulation, chlorophyll fluorescence parameter maximum quantum yield of photosystem II photochemistry ( F v / F m ) and dehydrin relative accumulation was performed as described previously in Kosová et al (2015) . Youngest fully developed leaves were used for the analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the decrease of water uptake of roots due to decreasing RA led to the deficits of R. pseudoacacia seedlings. An increase in the resistance to water flow from soil to plant is common in saline conditions (Farissi et al, 2013;Kosová et al, 2014;Li et al, 2016;Ranjit et al, 2016;Álvarez and Sánchez-Blanco, 2014). In this paper, roots suffered the most severe water deficit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Предобработка фитогормонами, наиболее заметно в случае БАП в начальный период стресса, способствовала интенсификации повышения содержания пролина в растениях в ответ на ПЭГ. Литературные данные свидетельствуют об индукции осмотическим стрессом накопления пролина и глицинбетаина в злаках и их участии в стабилизации антиоксидантных ферментов [Kosová et al, 2015]. Накопление различных осморегулирующих веществ, в частности пролина в цитоплазме, восстанавливает осмотический потенциал растений, благодаря чему нормализуется снабжение клеток водой и приходит в норму растяжимость клеток.…”
Section: объекты и методыunclassified