2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) to 20 years of process and waste treatment changes at a bleached kraft pulp mill, and to mill shutdown

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
84
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
5
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of this type of contamination are given by various authors (Grant, 1982;Blavk and Bauman, 1991;Garcia et al 1995;Bowron et al, 2009;Diniz et al, 2010;MacLatchy et al, 2010;Kulshreshtha et al, 2011), who report that the cellulose and paper industry release a large quantity (i.e. metric tons) of chemical agents into aquatic areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of this type of contamination are given by various authors (Grant, 1982;Blavk and Bauman, 1991;Garcia et al 1995;Bowron et al, 2009;Diniz et al, 2010;MacLatchy et al, 2010;Kulshreshtha et al, 2011), who report that the cellulose and paper industry release a large quantity (i.e. metric tons) of chemical agents into aquatic areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stressful reproductive environment negatively impacts reproductive performance in many ways (Jardine et al, 1996;Janz et al, 1997;Bowron et al, 2009). Similarly, stressed catfish spawn fewer eggs numbers (Ayinla, 1991;Adebayo, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies show that these techniques are more sensitive in identifying changes, the question is whether these changes are significant or meaningful for the organism and will translate to more relevant adverse effects. Over several years of the EEM program, a critical effect size was developed to interpret the severity of responses [70] for all the endpoints. This is important to develop for these molecular endpoints, so that agreement can be reached regarding how big of a change is needed before further monitoring or corrective action/remediation is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal differences across sites may also be a result of differences in habitat conditions (discussed in Recommended parameters to measure and report) among years, highlighting the importance of site characterization. For example, even within reference sites, the coefficient of variation in female white sucker gonad size between years is generally the mean AE 2 standard deviations [70]. Using reference sites to characterize natural variability is necessary to define triggers for more intense monitoring and to discern how big a change is important, 2 required items for a successful EEM program [60].…”
Section: Sampling Period and Temporal Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%