2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses to drought stress in Prunus sargentii and Larix kaempferi seedlings using morphological and physiological parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
117
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
15
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This higher efficiency under dehydrating conditions of secondary needles is in agreement with experiments comparing seedlings of P. canariensis with both needle types developed under very arid conditions [17]. Drought experiments under controlled conditions have shown increasing LMA and decreasing A N in seedlings of some conifers [64] and a reduced leaf/area ratio in seedlings of P. canariensis, in which interaction with irradiance conditions was markedly relevant, i.e., more drastic effects of drought were obtained in a shade environment [65]. However, none of these studies has compared physiological responses of primary vs. secondary needles, which could increase our current understanding about the influence that leaf anatomical differences have on the functioning of P. canariensis needles.…”
Section: Water Relations and Stress Tolerancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This higher efficiency under dehydrating conditions of secondary needles is in agreement with experiments comparing seedlings of P. canariensis with both needle types developed under very arid conditions [17]. Drought experiments under controlled conditions have shown increasing LMA and decreasing A N in seedlings of some conifers [64] and a reduced leaf/area ratio in seedlings of P. canariensis, in which interaction with irradiance conditions was markedly relevant, i.e., more drastic effects of drought were obtained in a shade environment [65]. However, none of these studies has compared physiological responses of primary vs. secondary needles, which could increase our current understanding about the influence that leaf anatomical differences have on the functioning of P. canariensis needles.…”
Section: Water Relations and Stress Tolerancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[42,109,110] in addition to whole-plant water availability [4,[111][112][113][114][115]. Therefore, the effect of midday depression due to stomatal closure [60,110,112,115] and photoinhibition [60,112] also would significantly alter the daily carbon gain of leaves. Furthermore, the strength of such effects may differ between sun and shade leaves [60,112,115].…”
Section: Morphological Acclimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the effect of midday depression due to stomatal closure [60,110,112,115] and photoinhibition [60,112] also would significantly alter the daily carbon gain of leaves. Furthermore, the strength of such effects may differ between sun and shade leaves [60,112,115]. Further detailed studies are therefore needed to reconfirm our findings before generation.…”
Section: Morphological Acclimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, tree growth can to some extent cope with intensified drought via various physiological mechanisms. First, trees can shift their behaviors in terms of coupling of water and carbon processes, including reducing shoot water potential and opening of the stomata and increasing water use efficiency (Trahan and Schubert 2016;Bhusal et al 2020). Second, trees can adapt their water use strategy to seasonal changes in plant water supply, as evidenced by a clear shift in water uptake from shallow soil layers in early growing-season to deeper soil layers in late growing-season in our study (Fig.…”
Section: Vulnerability Of Tree Growth To Droughtmentioning
confidence: 64%