Responses to Raven matrices: Governed by visual complexity and centrality

Abstract

Raven matrices are widely considered a pure test of cognitive abilities. Previous research has examined the extent to which cognitive strategies are predictive of the number of correct responses to Raven items. This study examined whether response times can be explained directly from the centrality and visual complexity of the matrix cells (edge density and perceived complexity). A total of 159 participants completed a 12-item version of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices. In addition to item number (an index of item difficulty), the findings demonstrated a positive correlation between the visual complexity of Raven items and both the mean response time and the number of fixations on the matrix (a strong correlate of response time). Moreover, more centrally placed cells as well as more complex cells received more fixations. It is concluded that response times on Raven matrices are impacted by low-level stimulus attributes, namely, visual complexity and eccentricity.

Improving the accuracy of social work judgements: A proof‐of‐concept study of a training programme

“…In our study, we used five items in which respondents were asked to identify the next sequential shape, or the missing piece from an image. While there is some debate (ibid) over the meaning of the results, it is widely believed they provide a test of general cognitive abilities (de Winter et al, 2023) 1 point per correct answer (min = 0, max = 5)…”