2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-010-0255-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses to selection of S5 inbreds for broad-based resistance to ear rots and grain mycotoxin contamination caused by Fusarium spp. in maize

Abstract: Random S 5 inbreds derived from three F 2 maize (Zea mays L.) populations (L1934 9 LP918, LP915 9 LP2541 and L7310 9 L7266) were selected for ear rot resistance after inoculation with a lowfumonisin producing isolate belonging to F. proliferatum. The four less susceptible and the four most susceptible inbreds from each population were crossed and F 1 seeds were pooled. Resistant and susceptible pools from each population were evaluated for disease severity (percentage of the ear visibly diseased) after inocula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To select the parents of the mapping population, single rows of 650 F 7 -to-F 9 inbreds representing a wide range of variability of the Argentinian temperate maize germplasm, were evaluated in Pergamino 2004/2005, for resistance to ear rot after inoculation of P319, a highly aggressive isolate belonging to Section Liseola Presello et al 2011). Twenty of the most resistant and some susceptible inbreds were selected.…”
Section: Genetic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To select the parents of the mapping population, single rows of 650 F 7 -to-F 9 inbreds representing a wide range of variability of the Argentinian temperate maize germplasm, were evaluated in Pergamino 2004/2005, for resistance to ear rot after inoculation of P319, a highly aggressive isolate belonging to Section Liseola Presello et al 2011). Twenty of the most resistant and some susceptible inbreds were selected.…”
Section: Genetic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that disease severity accounts for most of grain mycotoxin concentration and selection for disease resistance would produce indirect responses for grain mycotoxin accumulation. Specific host mechanisms preventing mycotoxin accumulation regardless of the amount of disease also seem to exist (Presello et al 2011) and further genetic progress might be achieved by understanding and using such mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct selection for reduction of mycotoxin contamination is expensive and time consuming, so indirect, cheaper and less time consuming selection criteria are necessary [ 97 ]. In this context, Fusarium ear rot has emerged as a suitable trait for performing indirect selection because high genotypic correlations between Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin contents have been reported [ 92 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ].We also include those works focused on exploring genetic variability for Fusarium ear rot and/or to study maize genetics involved in resistance to Fusarium ear rot.…”
Section: Maize Breeding For Resistance To Kernel Contamination Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, the private industry began to release inbreds and hybrids with above average resistance to Fusarium ear rot according to the seed patents from Pioneer Hi-bred Int Inc approved since 1997 [ 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 ]. More interestingly, breeding for resistance to one mycotoxigenic species could affect resistance to other ones [ 98 , 130 , 132 ].…”
Section: Maize Breeding For Resistance To Kernel Contamination Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of genetic resistance is one of the most effective practices for disease control, and pedigree selection is an effective method to obtain genetic gain for ear rot resistance [ 30 – 33 ]. Another important part of effective crop protection strategy against ear rot is monitoring the Fusarium species associated with maize as well as with the specific environment [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%