2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01865.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses to the Proposed DSM-V Changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the idea of merging the two disorders together is still mainly based on clinical judgement rather than sufficient empirical evidence, the suggestion has been welcomed by many professionals and is regarded as one of the most important propositions to be considered in DSM 5. Some authors (24) state that HSDD and FSAD share commonalities at the symptom level but data exists showing that they are distinguishable from each other (25). In a review made by DeRogatis in 2010, Goldstein and Goldstein suggest 3 categories such as HSDD, FSAD and FSIAD, as some women may have both desire and arousal problems while others clearly have only one (24).…”
Section: Diagnostic Criteria For Substance-induced Sexual Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the idea of merging the two disorders together is still mainly based on clinical judgement rather than sufficient empirical evidence, the suggestion has been welcomed by many professionals and is regarded as one of the most important propositions to be considered in DSM 5. Some authors (24) state that HSDD and FSAD share commonalities at the symptom level but data exists showing that they are distinguishable from each other (25). In a review made by DeRogatis in 2010, Goldstein and Goldstein suggest 3 categories such as HSDD, FSAD and FSIAD, as some women may have both desire and arousal problems while others clearly have only one (24).…”
Section: Diagnostic Criteria For Substance-induced Sexual Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors (24) state that HSDD and FSAD share commonalities at the symptom level but data exists showing that they are distinguishable from each other (25). In a review made by DeRogatis in 2010, Goldstein and Goldstein suggest 3 categories such as HSDD, FSAD and FSIAD, as some women may have both desire and arousal problems while others clearly have only one (24). They emphasize the disadvantages of lumping FSD on the basis of less precise definitions that may cause more difficult to treat conditions.…”
Section: Diagnostic Criteria For Substance-induced Sexual Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Changes to nosologic categories typically involve splitting populations, rather than merging or lumping them, in order to increase diagnostic precision and potentially enable clinicians to select treatments that are most likely to be effective. The lumping of diagnostic categories as a strategy for revision carries with it significant risks that the merged category will exclude many women who do not meet criteria for the new disorder, thereby compromising our ability to provide diagnosis and treatment for women with sexual disorders (DeRogatis et al, 2010b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%