2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsibility and liability in emergency management to natural disasters: A Canadian example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 2015, home insurance thus increasingly also includes protection against inland flooding caused by riverine, creek or lake overflow and heavy rainfall, although it is limited to properties outside high-risk floodplains; coastal flood insurance remains unavailable. Take-up of household insurance is low: estimates suggest a rate of 10-15% (Raikes and McBean, 2016;Nadarajah, 2016;IBC, 2017a). Earthquake insurance may be purchased in addition to standard home insurance, with higher deductibles than for other perils.…”
Section: Estimation Of Insurance Payoutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2015, home insurance thus increasingly also includes protection against inland flooding caused by riverine, creek or lake overflow and heavy rainfall, although it is limited to properties outside high-risk floodplains; coastal flood insurance remains unavailable. Take-up of household insurance is low: estimates suggest a rate of 10-15% (Raikes and McBean, 2016;Nadarajah, 2016;IBC, 2017a). Earthquake insurance may be purchased in addition to standard home insurance, with higher deductibles than for other perils.…”
Section: Estimation Of Insurance Payoutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raikes & McBean argue that a lack of standards in emergency management legislation, restrictive access to financial assistance and/or compensation and reduced government exposure to civil liability a common law expose private land owners to greater vulnerability to disasters and the liability attached [16].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Raikes and McBean (2016) explain, privatising aspects of emergency management that have shown to be related to inefficient government administration enables government to avoid legal responsibility. The privatisation of responsibility and re-regulation in support of market mechanisms has the potential to generate what Prudham (2004;cited by O'Reilly & Dhanju, 2012) refers to as 'normal accidents of neoliberalism', whereby risks are produced systemically in what he calls 'organised' (and to which could be added 'normalised') 'irresponsibility'.…”
Section: Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%