Responsibility in Uncertain Times: An Institutional Perspective on Precaution

Abstract

Precaution is a key issue in environmental governance. Variously defined, intensively debated and introduced in many regulations, its meaning, scope and application remain problematic. This article argues that the controversy on precaution is a matter of culturally patterned expectations concerning the production and use of knowledge and the related social positions and responsibilities. The way uncertainty and its role in the policy process are understood is crucial. For some precaution is a flawed concept, to be accommodated to the current expert-based cooperative scheme. For others it is a major innovation requiring a rearrangement of the latter. Precautionary policies may evolve in different directions. They may either strengthen the role of means-ends rationality, increasing people's dependence on expert knowledge and shrinking the opportunity and scope of public debate or, on the contrary, enhance the role of value-commitments, leading to a decline in the legitimacy of established hierarchies and an intensification of intractable controversies. (c) 2008 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Signaled and Silenced Aspects of Nuclear Safety: A Critical Evaluation of International Nuclear Safety Thinking

“…Endorsing harmony values and communal trust norms means regarding other people as equal and the relationship with them as mutually reinforcing. Status and skill are not necessarily a clue to trustworthiness in this case because trust is a by-product of social connectedness, mutual understanding, identity, and resource sharing (Pellizzoni & Yl€ onen, 2008).…”

Global governance in the context of climate change: the challenges of increasingly complex risk parameters

“…56 Risk and increasingly complexity promise to exacerbate these. 57 While some of these global challenges are similar to those at the national level-such as the complexity of technical issues, the inter-connectedness of impact and the difficulties of bringing science to bear-other are distinct and the challenges are amplified at the global level. 58 Challenges of coordination, for instance, are greater when among nation-states, as are the challenges of apportioning responsibility and costs between countries.…”

Risk and Responsibility in a Manufactured World

“…To apply the principle means to behave according to such an order, thus to contribute to reproducing or (re)establishing it. One may not know (enough of) the causal chain, yet if action is consistent with the world order, then the unknown will operate according to such an order, in the long run at least (Pellizzoni and Ylönen 2008). 5 Adverse consequences (like heightened costs) are therefore negligible, to the extent that they are marginal to the final result (enhancing health protection).…”