1962
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(62)90092-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsibility of the dentist in complete dentures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dental casts have been used by many authors to measure the tooth dimension and distances of the landmarks in many studies and many of them have used alginate as an impression material. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The standardization of cast was necessary as linear measurement between two points or objects in a space would be difficult when the objects are not arranged on the same plane. In the past, studies have been done by using various methods like vernier caliper with two limbs that are adjustable with shorter and longer limbs contacting the objects at two different planes to measure the linear distance; 16 some used the contourmeter to orient the plane 21 with measuring dial guage, while Grave and Beker used Ney surveyor and vernier caliper for the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dental casts have been used by many authors to measure the tooth dimension and distances of the landmarks in many studies and many of them have used alginate as an impression material. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The standardization of cast was necessary as linear measurement between two points or objects in a space would be difficult when the objects are not arranged on the same plane. In the past, studies have been done by using various methods like vernier caliper with two limbs that are adjustable with shorter and longer limbs contacting the objects at two different planes to measure the linear distance; 16 some used the contourmeter to orient the plane 21 with measuring dial guage, while Grave and Beker used Ney surveyor and vernier caliper for the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The posterior point was also used by other authors. 8,13,14,16,21 However, measurements have also been done from the middle point of the papilla 6,7,[9][10][11][12]14,20,30 and some had done from both points. 14,26 In the present study, the mean distance between the labial surface of the maxillary incisors and the posterior border of the papilla was found to be 11.59 mm (SD 1.3 When comparing the result with Caucasians, a difference of about 1.6 mm is seen in this population.…”
Section: 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most obvious landmark, however, is the incisive papilla 8 appears to have survived intact from the dentate state and received a great deal of attention 9 . The studies suggested various points for measurement from the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisors to the incisive papilla: one group of scholars have adopted the center of the papilla as a reference point for measurement [10][11][12][13] , while other authors have preferred to end at the posterior border of papilla. The differences between scholars were not confined only to the determination of the point of reference but extended to the measurements as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between scholars were not confined only to the determination of the point of reference but extended to the measurements as well. Adopting the center of the papilla as the reference point of the measurements, Harper 10 suggested 5-8 mm; McGee 11 preferred 7.7 mm; while Hickey et al 12 and Martone 13 suggested 8-10 mm. On the other hand, taking the posterior border of papilla as the point of reference, Erlich and Gazit reported an average of 12-13 mm 14 , while Solomon and Arunachalam reported 11.9mm 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harper (1948) stated that the incisal edges of the upper central incisors should be set 5–8 mm in front of the centre of the papilla. Hickey, Boucher & Woelfel (1962), Martone (1963), Murray (1977) and Mavroskoufis & Ritchie (1981) preferred 8–10 mm for this measurement, whereas Schiffman (1964) related the canines to a line bisecting the papilla. Erlich & Gazit (1975) found that the labial surfaces of the central incisors were an average of 12–13 mm anterior to the midpoint of the papilla.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%