2023
DOI: 10.1007/s43681-023-00325-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsible artificial intelligence in human resources management: a review of the empirical literature

Abstract: As it is the case for many business processes and activities disciplines, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated in human resources management (HRM). While AI has great potential to augment the HRM activities in organizations, automating the management of humans is not without risks and limitations. The identification of these risks is fundamental to promote responsible use of AI in HRM. We thus conducted a review of the empirical academic literature across disciplines on the affordances and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work holds implications for scholars and practitioners alike. Scholars of many disciplines have already pointed towards the potential danger of algorithmic bias (e.g., Baker & Hawn, 2022;Bujold et al, 2023;Kordzadeh & Ghasemaghaei, 2022). Recent developments and advancements in generative AI have added to the scenarios in which algorithmic bias could lead to discrimination or reinforce existing stereotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work holds implications for scholars and practitioners alike. Scholars of many disciplines have already pointed towards the potential danger of algorithmic bias (e.g., Baker & Hawn, 2022;Bujold et al, 2023;Kordzadeh & Ghasemaghaei, 2022). Recent developments and advancements in generative AI have added to the scenarios in which algorithmic bias could lead to discrimination or reinforce existing stereotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conjunction with previous investigations specifically addressing AI and HRM (e.g., Parry and Battista, 2019;Kaur et al, Budhwar et al, 2022;Garg et al, 2022;Gélinas et al, 2022;Palos-Sánchez et al, 2022;Vrontis et al, 2022;Pereira et al, 2023;Alsaif and Sabih Aksoy, 2023;Basu et al, 2023;Bujold et al, 2023;Chowdhury et al, 2023;Jatobá et al, 2023;Kaushal and Ghalawat, 2023;Malik et al, 2023;Pan and Froese, 2023;Prikshat et al, 2023), we provide several contributions to the academic field. First, to our knowledge, our scoping review is the most inclusive so far, as we expanded our data extraction across four disciplines (management, HRM/IR, psychology, and IS).…”
Section: Theoretical Implications and Agenda For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These three phases, from technocratic to fully-embedded, are derived based on the evolution of AI technology adoption within the field of HRM. The first two phases are based on recent empirical literature on AI in HRM (e.g., Arslan et al, 2022 ; Bansal et al, 2023 ; Bujold et al, 2023 ). The last phase is our conceptual view, and it represents a logical progression of how AI is integrated into HRM practices and aligns with broader developments in technology adoption and societal goals (e.g., He et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: How Hrm Can Bring Humans and Machines Closer Together In The...mentioning
confidence: 99%