Responsible Business in Fragile Contexts: Comparing Perceptions from Domestic and Foreign Firms in Myanmar

Abstract

After decades of isolation, Myanmar opened up its economy to international trade in 2012. This opening led to a rapid influx of international investment, exposure to the international corporate social responsibility (CSR) community and presumed pressures to conform to related norms and practices. We report on a large-scale survey of firms operating in Myanmar, comparing perceptions of corporate practitioners of CSR and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Our findings show that awareness levels of CSR among domestic Myanmar firms match those of their international peers, but the application of and selection criteria for CSR implementation by domestic firms in Myanmar differs from typical CSR activities observed in other parts of the world, in particular by Global North firms. More surprisingly, Myanmar firms have a higher awareness of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) than their multinational counterparts. Our findings have implications for CSR advocacy in Myanmar as well as for the dissemination of corporate responsibility and sustainability into the developing world more generally.

Scoping the Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Research in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Era

“…Other articles, however, mentioned more than one SDG in their studies. For instance, Barkemeyer and Miklian [85] explored the implications of their results on more than one SDG, and Zavyalova, Studenikin, and Starikova [54] attempted to frame the CSR initiatives of a leading multinational company under the umbrella of a number of SDGs. Overall, this review opens various potential avenues for new research in the business-society field specifically, and in the sustainable development discipline in general.…”

SMEs and exogenous shocks: A conceptual literature review and forward research agenda

“…This can refer to direct engagement, as in those firms undertaking conflict prevention activities (De Vidovgrad, 2015; Felgenhauer, 2007; Rettberg, 2004), or in supporting conflict reduction activities by other actors, such as post-conflict private sector development and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reconciliation (DDR) projects (Giustozzi, 2006). However, the societal and business benefits of such action for peacebuilding remain unclear, uneven and perhaps even counter-productive, with contemporary research (Barkemeyer and Miklian, 2019; Ganson et al, 2019; Joseph et al, 2020; Katsos and Al Kafaji, 2019; Miklian and Medina Bickel, 2020) attempting to contribute to better understanding the conditions for, and challenges of, successful small business participation in the reduction of political violence.…”

Advancing transcendent development: An in‐depth review of developmental corporate social responsibility’s value proposition, inhibitions, and inclusive sustainable development prospects

“…Some scholars replaced “DO” terminology with concepts such as The South or Global South with some publications even going as far as classifying international trade relations between developing countries as South–South Trade or South–South Cooperation (Arevalo, 2014; Barkemeyer & Miklian, 2019; Hayk, 2019; Lund‐Thomsen et al., 2014; de Melo et al., 2019; Mihić et al., 2019). Another conceptual synonym used for “DO” is the commonly known development finance and investment term Emerging compounded with other descriptors resulting in conceptual alternatives like Emerging Country , Emerging Economy , Emerging Market, and even Emerging Nation (Aracil, 2019; Mukhopadhyay & Paul, 2019; Tong et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2015).…”