PurposeTo identify the content of an educational handover letter from undergraduate to graduate education in General Surgery.
MethodExpert consensus was attained on the content of an educational handover letter. A 3-stage Delphi technique was employed with 8 experts in each of 4 stakeholder groups: program directors in general surgery, medical student surgical acting internship or prep course directors, authors of medical student performance evaluations, and current categorical General Surgery residents. Data were collected from April through July 2019. A mixed method analysis was performed to quantitatively assess items selected for inclusion and qualitatively provide guidance for the implantation of such a letter.
ResultsAll 32 experts participated in at least one round. Of the 285 initially identified individual items, 22 were ultimately selected for inclusion in the letter. All but one expert agreed that the list represents what the content of an educational handover letter in General Surgery should be. Qualitative analysis was performed on 395 comments and identified 4 themes to guide the implementation of the letter: "minimize redundancy, optimize impact, use appropriate assessments, and mitigate risk."
ConclusionsA framework and proposed template are provided for an educational handover letter from undergraduate to graduate medical education in General Surgery based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis of expert consensus of major stakeholders. This letter holds promise to enhance the transition from undergraduate to graduate medical education by allowing programs to capitalize on strengths and efficiently address knowledge gaps in new trainees.At present, the only information on medical student performance provided by medical schools to residency programs is the medical student performance evaluation (MSPE, formerly "Dean's Letter"). This evaluation has been criticized for its strong bias in favor of students, except in the few areas where truly objective data is reported, such as class standing. Even course grades can be unreliable due to grade inflation. 1,2 Despite efforts by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to standardize the MSPE, the actual product received by residency programs is highly variable with less than ½ of U.S. and Canadian schools complying with the AAMC's recommendations. 3,4 Across these medical schools, as many as 72 different terms are used to describe the top tier of students. 5