2020
DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2020.1763289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsible research and innovation in science education: insights from evaluating the impact of using digital media and arts-based methods on RRI values

Abstract: The European Commission policy approach of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is gaining momentum in European research planning and development as a strategy to align scientific and technological progress with socially desirable and acceptable ends. One of the RRI agendas is science education, aiming to foster future generations' acquisition of skills and values needed to engage in society responsibly. To this end, it is argued that RRI-based science education can benefit from more interdisciplinary met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies about plant awareness disparity were overly focused on quantitative measures of knowledge deficit and/or acquisition, neglecting the affective aspects of plant awareness and learning, which is a common problem in science education (Lee et al, 2015). This is an important limitation because the methods used to observe a phenomenon influence its outcomes (Ruiz‐Mallén et al, 2021). It is also plausible that the differing distributions of plant awareness characteristics across age groups shown in Table 5 were determined by what was measured rather than actual differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies about plant awareness disparity were overly focused on quantitative measures of knowledge deficit and/or acquisition, neglecting the affective aspects of plant awareness and learning, which is a common problem in science education (Lee et al, 2015). This is an important limitation because the methods used to observe a phenomenon influence its outcomes (Ruiz‐Mallén et al, 2021). It is also plausible that the differing distributions of plant awareness characteristics across age groups shown in Table 5 were determined by what was measured rather than actual differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the literature shows that researchers discuss the application of innovations in science education (Laudonia et al, 2018;Leeuwis, Aarts, 2016;Mestrinho, Cavadas, 2018;Ng et al, 2019). Scholars analyze the role of science teachers' self-efficacy in innovation (Dede et al, 2017); highlight the influence of communication on innovation of science education (Eilks et al, 2010); look for the implementation of responsible research and innovation (RRI) in science education (Bayram-Jacobs, 2015;Heras, Berrens, 2020;Ocada, 2016;Okada, Sherborne, 2018;Ruiz-Mallén et al, 2020); discuss science education and ICT innovation (Rusek et al, 2017); analyze innovative thinking of science teachers (Wisetsat, Nuangchalerm, 2019); and argue about innovative strategies in science teaching (Oyelekan et al, 2017). Analyzing the research findings on the application of innovations in the educational practice of science subjects, it has to be stated that researchers are more often interested in the external side of innovations -the application of innovations.…”
Section: Science Teachers' Innovative Work Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four modeling methods in virtual reality: geometric modeling, motion modeling, physical modeling, and action modeling [19]. There are two methods of geometric modeling: manual and automatic.…”
Section: Digital Media Technology Modeling Based On Virtual Reality Tmentioning
confidence: 99%