2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12931-020-01359-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Abstract: Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) specific version of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) and King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) are validated health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments, but no or limited data exist on their responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The objectives of this study were to assess responsiveness of SGRQ-I and K-BILD and determine MCID separately for deterioration and improvement in a large, prospec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion criteria were intellectual or linguistic barriers preventing the completion of questionnaires. ILD-specific HRQL questionnaires have been validated in the same cohort [19][20][21].…”
Section: Study Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria were intellectual or linguistic barriers preventing the completion of questionnaires. ILD-specific HRQL questionnaires have been validated in the same cohort [19][20][21].…”
Section: Study Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 studies made use of the ILD-specific King A limited number of studies used disease-specific (IPF) instruments, although many of the studies were conducted after their development in 2010. Of these, five studies [52,[70][71][72][73] used the disease-specific format of the SGRQ, the SGRQ-I, and three used "A Tool to Assess Quality of life in IPF" (ATAQ-IPF) [44,48,74]. supplementary material S9.…”
Section: Hrqol Measurement Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No clear patterns of disease behaviour were observed for IPF versus non-IPF ILD for PROs. In patients with IPF, EQ-5D-5L health state VAS score and K-BILD total score tended to worsen over time, but these changes did not exceed previously reported ranges of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) [ 29 , 30 ]. In patients with non-IPF ILD, the improvements from baseline in EQ-5D-5L health state VAS score and K-BILD total score were not greater than the previously reported range of MCIDs [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In patients with IPF, EQ-5D-5L health state VAS score and K-BILD total score tended to worsen over time, but these changes did not exceed previously reported ranges of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) [ 29 , 30 ]. In patients with non-IPF ILD, the improvements from baseline in EQ-5D-5L health state VAS score and K-BILD total score were not greater than the previously reported range of MCIDs [ 29 , 30 ]. However, in patients with IPF, the deterioration from baseline in EQ-5D index score was within the reported MCID range of 0.005–0.054 [ 29 ] and the same applied for the improvement from baseline in EQ-5D index score in patients with non-IPF ILD [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%