2020
DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.19.05545-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For secondary outcomes, pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale and passive range of motion by a goniometer. A clinical change in the Modified Ashworth Scale was noted, according to the parameters of Chen et al 35 and part of the change was maintained over the long term, consistent with the results of Jia et al 36 The results of this review support the hypothesis that extracorporeal shock waves influence the non-neural component of spasticity, and improve myofascial viscoelasticity, muscle stiffness and connective tissue. Our data show that a combination of shockwave therapy and conventional physiotherapy is more effective in reducing muscle tension in spastic muscles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For secondary outcomes, pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale and passive range of motion by a goniometer. A clinical change in the Modified Ashworth Scale was noted, according to the parameters of Chen et al 35 and part of the change was maintained over the long term, consistent with the results of Jia et al 36 The results of this review support the hypothesis that extracorporeal shock waves influence the non-neural component of spasticity, and improve myofascial viscoelasticity, muscle stiffness and connective tissue. Our data show that a combination of shockwave therapy and conventional physiotherapy is more effective in reducing muscle tension in spastic muscles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Scale is graded from 0 to 4 and presented as: 0, no increase in muscle tone, with limb moving freely; 1, slight increase in muscle tone, with a catch and release or minimal resistance at the end of the ROM during flexion and extension; 1+, slight increase in muscle tone with a catch and minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM; 2, more marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, with affected limb moving easily; 3, considerable increase in muscle tone, with difficulty in passive movement; 4, limited joint movement. Maximum score in the study was 5, and the 1+ was converted to 2 [16].…”
Section: Behavioral Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (Van Heest et al., 2015). Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) (Chen et al., 2019). Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) (Brashear et al., 2002).…”
Section: Patient Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%