2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00291-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness of measures in the effort–reward imbalance questionnaire to organizational changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One scale measures the intrinsic component of "overcommitment" (OC; short version with six Likert scale items defining a one-dimensional scale) 24) . Studies have confirmed high internal reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ERI Questionnaire 26,27) .…”
Section: Job Stressmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…One scale measures the intrinsic component of "overcommitment" (OC; short version with six Likert scale items defining a one-dimensional scale) 24) . Studies have confirmed high internal reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ERI Questionnaire 26,27) .…”
Section: Job Stressmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…17 For the employees who had been affected by restructuring of their company due to economic hardship, two consecutive questionnaire surveys were conducted over a specific period. A total of 544 full-time employees responded to both surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NSS [18][19][20] , a well-known and widely used scale, has 7 subscales: death and dying, conflict with physicians, inadequate preparation, problems with peers and supervisors, workload, and uncertainty concerning treatment. The ERI questionnaire 21) used to assess effortreward imbalance is based on the ERI model, a theoretical concept advocated by Siegrist 22) which proposes to assess the adverse health effects of stressful experience at work [23][24][25] . This model defines stressful experience at work as an imbalance between high effort expended and low reward received.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%