Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain

Ma, Chao; Wu, Shaoling; Xiao, Lingjun; Xue, Yunlian

doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1624-2

Cited by 41 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar relationship between the MIC and MDC was also calculated for the English version of the MODQ in three previous studies (6 vs. 12.6) [12], (9 vs. 12.8) [34], and (5 vs. 13.1) [35]. This was also the case in several responsiveness studies of the ODQ [52,62,77]. Some studies attributed that to the anchor used for calculation, the global change scale, which could be very subjective and influenced by recall bias [62,77].…”

Section: Plos Onesupporting

confidence: 83%

“…This was also the case in several responsiveness studies of the ODQ [52,62,77]. Some studies attributed that to the anchor used for calculation, the global change scale, which could be very subjective and influenced by recall bias [62,77]. Therefore, and since the MDC value of the Arabic-MODQ exceeds the MIC, and it is relatively well above the SEM, we suggest considering a change of more than 8 points (i.e., the MDC 95% ) after two-week of treatment as a true change in patient status [35], as described earlier in the discussion.…”

Section: Plos Onesupporting

confidence: 56%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) is used for evaluating the functional disability in patients with low back pain (LBP). However, the measurement characteristics of the MODQ among Arab patients are unknown. In this study, we aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the MODQ into Arabic and evaluate its psychometric properties. MethodsAn Arabic version of the MODQ was developed through forward translation, translation synthesis, and backward translation. Sixty-eight patients (55 males and 13 females) with a mean age 37.01 ± 7.57 years were recruited to assess its psychometric properties. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test retest reliability (utilizing intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at 95% confidence level (MDC 95% ), and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). The construct validity was investigated by correlating the new translation with four other measures of LBP (using Spearman's rho). Finally, receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to compute the sensitivity, using the area under the curve (AUC), and the minimum important change (MIC). An alpha level of 0.05 was set for statistical tests and all the psychometric values were tested against a priori hypotheses. ResultsThe culturally aligned MODQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85). The ICC, SEM, MDC 95% , and LOA between baseline and two days later were 0.98, 1.60, 4.43, and -4.23 to 7.70, respectively, while the values between baseline and 14 days later were PLOS ONE PLOS ONE | https://doi.

show abstract

Section: Plos Onesupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Plos Onesupporting

confidence: 56%

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A modified version of the ODI was tested in a Persian population, and tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and convergent validity yielded much lower values than those of the present study (ICC=0.43-0.80, Cronbach's α=0.69, r=-0.54, p<0.001 for highest value, respectively) [27]. Studies assessing the same properties in the Korean and Chinese versions have found similar positive results [28,29]. The values obtained from the present study are quite similar to those of the aforementioned studies, supporting the finding that the PDI is a valid and reliable tool.…”

Section: Generalizabilitysupporting

confidence: 39%

Reliability and validity of the patellofemoral disability index as a measure of functional performance and subjective pain in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Alshaharani

Lohman

Bahjri

et al. 2018

PTRS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a condition that is characterized by patellar discomfort or pain that is aggravated during certain activities such as ascending/descending stairs. The Patellofemoral Disability Index (PDI) was developed to assess the effect of pain on functional activities in individuals with PFPS. The objectives of the current study were to determine the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity of this index. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Forty-one subjects who had PFPS with a mean age of 28.8±5.0 years and a mean body mass index of 25.6±4.7 kg/m 2 participated in the study. All subjects were concurrently enrolled in a clinical trial for which they were instructed to complete hamstring-resistance exercises for 4 weeks. Over the course of the intervention, they completed both the PDI and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline after two weeks, and after four weeks. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the criterion validity. Cronbach's α was used to examine the internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence interval were computed to examine test-retest reliability. Results: Subjects' responses within both the PDI and the ODI yielded Pearson correlation coefficient values that were positive and highly significant (range, 0.73-0.97; p<0.001). There was a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α≥0.8), with the exception of stair climbing (Cronbach's α=0.65). Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.87 to 0.92, indicating high levels of test-retest reliability. Conclusions: The PDI is a valid, reliable, and feasible method of assessing pain and functional ability in patients with PFPS.

show abstract

“…The tool assesses 8 major domains across physical and mental health [ 39 , 40 ]. For each of the 8 domains, the items were coded, summed, and transformed into a 0–100 scale, where 0 indicates the worst health-related quality of life and a score of 100 indicates the best health-related quality of life [ 33 , 36 ]. The bodily pain subscale was reverse coded before transforming into a 0–100 scale to ensure that the higher item value indicates better health on SF-36-Am [ 41 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the Amharic version pain self-efficacy questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia

Chala

Donnelly

Wondie

et al. 2021

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a valid and reliable instrument that evaluates pain self-efficacy beliefs in people with pain conditions. However, it has not been validated and used in Ethiopia. We conducted this study to translate, adapt, and test the psychometric properties of the PSEQ in the Amharic language and Ethiopian context for its use with people experiencing low back pain (LBP). Methods The PSEQ was translated into Amharic and then back-translated into English. An expert review committee created a final Amharic version of the tool (PSEQ-Am), followed by pilot testing and cognitive debriefing with a sample of 20 people with LBP. The psychometric properties of the final version of PSEQ-Am were assessed in a sample of 240 people with LBP recruited from three rehabilitation centers in Ethiopia. Cronbach’s alpha and Intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to describe the reliability and internal consistency of the tool. The SF-36-Am bodily pain subscale was used to assess convergent validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were performed to determine the dimensionality of the instrument. Results PSEQ-Am demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91). As hypothesized, the tool demonstrated a significant moderate correlation with the Bodily Pain subscale of the SF-36-Am (Rho = 0.51, p < 0.01). EFA analysis shows that the Amharic version of PSEQ is a dominant one factor and secondary two factor structure. Conclusion This study shows that PSEQ-Am is a reliable and valid tool that can be used in both clinical practice and research in the Ethiopian low back pain population.

show abstract

Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain

Cited by 41 publications

References 24 publications

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

Reliability and validity of the patellofemoral disability index as a measure of functional performance and subjective pain in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the Amharic version pain self-efficacy questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About