2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness of the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) in patients with hallux valgus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SAFE-Q is a reliable and valid measurement tool to evaluate foot-related QOL before and after HV surgery. 17 To our knowledge, no studies have used the SAFE-Q to evaluate the outcomes of HV surgery in patients without rheumatoid arthritis. In the present study, the SAFE-Q was only used in 14 patients (17 feet) at the final follow-up because this measurement tool was devised in 2013.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SAFE-Q is a reliable and valid measurement tool to evaluate foot-related QOL before and after HV surgery. 17 To our knowledge, no studies have used the SAFE-Q to evaluate the outcomes of HV surgery in patients without rheumatoid arthritis. In the present study, the SAFE-Q was only used in 14 patients (17 feet) at the final follow-up because this measurement tool was devised in 2013.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAFE-Q appears to be sufficient for the evaluation of foot-related QOL before and after surgery in patients with HV. 17 In addition, patients were asked whether they were satisfied, satisfied with reservation, or dissatisfied with the overall results of the surgery.…”
Section: Clinical and Radiologic Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the clinical outcomes was performed using the following tools: MOXFQ (Dawson et al 2006, Al-Nammari et al 2015, VAS (Dawson et al 2006, Choi et al 2013, Chen et al 2015, Hogea et al 2017, Lee et al 2017, Milczarek et al 2017, Lai et al 2018, Kaufmann et al 2019, the SF-36 (Saro et al 2007, Choi et al 2013), EuroQol-5D (EQ5-D) (Kaufmann et al 2019), and the SAFE-Q (Niki et al 2017).…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All they were very satisfied with the results at the final follow-up visit. In the late stages of the study, we tried to use the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) hallux and lesser toes scales 8,9 and the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) 10,11 both before and after MIS for clinical evaluations of IDC and LFC. In case 4 of IDC, JSSF hallux scales improved from 54 points to 100 points 13 months after surgery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%