2011
DOI: 10.1123/jsr.20.2.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness of the VAS and McGill Pain Questionnaire in Measuring Changes in Musculoskeletal Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution or return of symptoms was noted at the 6-week visit using a scoring system between 0% to 100% improvement. DASH scores [11], VAS scores [4], and resolution or return of symptoms were noted at the 6-month visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution or return of symptoms was noted at the 6-week visit using a scoring system between 0% to 100% improvement. DASH scores [11], VAS scores [4], and resolution or return of symptoms were noted at the 6-month visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high frequency of women among the TMD participants in our study is supported by t he l ite rat u r e, r ep or t i ng t h at 9 0% a r e female. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,25 There are many factors that contribute to the development of TMD, according to Okeson 1 and Leeuw, 26 primarily: occlusion conditions, trauma, emotional distress, and parafunctional habits (clenching and bruxism). Stress symptoms are associated with the development of TMD, and the manifestation of pain could be the chief cause of TMD 27,28 , as observed in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Visual Analog Scale is a common tool used in rehabilitation populations to measure pain and fatigue. The VAS has good psychometric properties (reliability: 0Á71-0Á94; validity: 0Á71-0Á91) and is sensitive to change in pain and inflammatory conditions (Hartrick et al 2003, Chaffee et al 2011, Hawker et al 2011.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%