2019
DOI: 10.12661/pap.2019.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resposta e eficiência agronômica em genótipos de milho à adubação nitrogenada no Sul do Pará

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancellier et al (2011), while evaluating the N use efficiency and the phenotypic correlation of 24 maize populations in the Southern region of the State of Tocantins, also observed higher yields in environments with high N dose; an environment with low N was 23% less productive. Santos et al (2017) and Santos et al (2018) also verified higher grain productivity in environments where the highest N dose was used. Similar results were also found by Soratto et al (2011), where grain productivity was influenced by N doses, and the application of increasing doses of N in covering provided a quadratic increase in the values of this variable, up to the estimated dose of 124 kg ha -1 , with an increase around 56.8%, in relation to the control treatment, without the application of N in covering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Cancellier et al (2011), while evaluating the N use efficiency and the phenotypic correlation of 24 maize populations in the Southern region of the State of Tocantins, also observed higher yields in environments with high N dose; an environment with low N was 23% less productive. Santos et al (2017) and Santos et al (2018) also verified higher grain productivity in environments where the highest N dose was used. Similar results were also found by Soratto et al (2011), where grain productivity was influenced by N doses, and the application of increasing doses of N in covering provided a quadratic increase in the values of this variable, up to the estimated dose of 124 kg ha -1 , with an increase around 56.8%, in relation to the control treatment, without the application of N in covering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%