Some facilities, such as Los Alamos National Laboratory, have contaminants at widely scattered locations Modeling of vadose zone hydrology is required to address a variety within a landscape of complex topography. This type of of applied problems in general and risk assessments associated with spatial distribution of contamination poses a particularly contaminants in particular. Risk assessments increasingly must focus on multisite, multipathway analyses as opposed to single-site, single challenging problem for risk assessment. While many of pathway analyses. Such assessments can be particularly challenging the contaminated sites within an area of concern may when contaminants are widely dispersed in complex topography. Here have relatively low levels of contamination, the redistriwe highlight how a set of contaminated sites situated within complex bution and concentration of these contaminants through topography can be effectively prioritized relative to vulnerability of environmental processes such as surface and subsurface contaminant transport from surface and subsurface flows. We used flow must be considered (Wilcox et al.a distributed hydrologic model, SPLASH, to assess the lateral flows Wilcox and Breshears, 1997; Newman et al., 1998; Johanof surface and subsurface water following the simulation of a 100-year sen et al., 2003). Because remediation associated with large precipitation event, which could correspond to an intense thunderareas of dispersed contaminants can be costly, assessstorm. Our case study was conducted in the North Ancho watershed ments that can prioritize remediation resources and efof Los Alamos National Laboratory, in northern New Mexico, USA, an area with widely dispersed contaminants and diverse topography. forts on those sites with some combination of the highest Simulated surface flows generally exceeded subsurface flows by more concentrations and vulnerability to transport are greatly than four orders of magnitude, indicating the relative importance of needed. Site contaminant inventories usually can be obpotential redistribution of contaminants by surface flows for this type tained with straightforward, albeit sometimes costly, samof precipitation event. For the 18 potential contaminant release sites pling, whereas assessing the vulnerability of a site to coninvestigated, the maximum surface flow varied by more than an order taminant transport is more challenging. of magnitude across the sites. Half of the sites had surface flows Ͻ25% A major determinant of contaminant transport is the of the maximum surface flow for a site, allowing for prioritization of amount of hydrological flow at a given site. Vulnerability those sites with the greatest vulnerability. Our results highlight how to contaminant transport can be associated with surrisks of contaminant transport can be effectively assessed in complex face and subsurface flows of water laterally through a topography using distributed hydrologic modeling.