2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restaurant membership fee and customer choice: The effects of sunk cost and feelings of regret

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From a rational perspective, a sunk cost that cannot be recovered should not affect the consumer’s purchase decision or attitude. However, previous studies have shown that in the consumer decision-making process, the sunk cost effect cannot be ignored [ 17 , 18 ]. Sunk costs in the research mainly refer to the remaining drug and other costs (tutelage costs, etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a rational perspective, a sunk cost that cannot be recovered should not affect the consumer’s purchase decision or attitude. However, previous studies have shown that in the consumer decision-making process, the sunk cost effect cannot be ignored [ 17 , 18 ]. Sunk costs in the research mainly refer to the remaining drug and other costs (tutelage costs, etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research has examined how the size of prior investment/purchase influences the decision making of future purchases (Park and Jang 2014; Stevens, More, and Markowski-Lindsay 2014; Jang, Mattila, and Bai 2007). For instance, Jang, Mattila, and Bai (2007) found that when a high membership fee was paid for a restaurant, customers chose to continue their patronage with the restaurant regardless of whether its competitor provided superior services with a free membership. However, no research in this area has investigated the effect of composite price in a tourism context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In economics research, this process is referred to as the sunk cost effect (Thaler, 1980). Research in this vein has found that “paying for the right to use a good or service will increase the rate at which the good will be utilized” (Thaler, 1980: 47, see also Anderson, 2009; Jang et al, 2007). By “sinking” money into purchasing a single piece of content, the user will likely utilize the content to a greater extent than a user who gets the same content for free.…”
Section: Story Selection and Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%