2014
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting and active motor thresholds versus stimulus–response curves to determine transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity in quadriceps femoris

Abstract: BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely-used investigative technique in motor cortical evaluation. Recently, there has been a surge in TMS studies evaluating lower-limb fatigue. TMS intensity of 120-130% resting motor threshold (RMT) and 120% active motor threshold (AMT) and TMS intensity determined using stimulus–response curves during muscular contraction have been used in these studies. With the expansion of fatigue research in locomotion, the quadriceps femoris is increasingly of inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stimulus–response curve at 20% MVC was used to determine optimal TMS intensity, as recently described by Temesi et al . (). Subjects performed brief contractions (∼2–3 s) at 20% MVC of the knee extensors with TMS delivered four consecutive times at each of the following randomly ordered stimulus intensities: 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% maximal stimulator output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A stimulus–response curve at 20% MVC was used to determine optimal TMS intensity, as recently described by Temesi et al . (). Subjects performed brief contractions (∼2–3 s) at 20% MVC of the knee extensors with TMS delivered four consecutive times at each of the following randomly ordered stimulus intensities: 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% maximal stimulator output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…During all voluntary contractions, TMS was delivered once the subject had contracted to the appropriate force level and the force had stabilized (Gruet et al 2013b). A stimulus-response curve at 20% MVC was used to determine optimal TMS intensity, as recently described by Temesi et al (2014a). Subjects performed brief contractions (ß2-3 s) at 20% MVC of the knee extensors with TMS delivered four consecutive times at each of the following randomly ordered stimulus intensities: 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% maximal stimulator output.…”
Section: Motor Cortical Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then markers were positioned over the participant and over the coil to maintain the coil location. After that, a recruitment curve was performed during voluntary contraction, at 10% of the maximal quadriceps torque, in order to determine the maximal intensity (noted I Mep ) [40]. One pulse was delivered every 10 s with increasing intensity in steps of 2% until the highest response was obtained.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Corticospinal Excitability By Transcranial Magmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hot spot, ineon, and vertex were drawn with a permanent marker on a swimming cap, in order to ensure repeatability between sessions. After locating the hot spot, the resting motor threshold (RMT), defined as the stimulation intensity that elicits MEPs of ∼50 µV peak-to-peak amplitude in 5 out of 10 applied pulses (Temesi et al, 2014), was set for each participant. We recorded ipsilaterally (Kamibayashi et al, 2009) TAnt and Soleus (SO), as well as Rectus Femoris (RF, as a control muscle not involved in the robotic ankle task).…”
Section: Neurophysiological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%