2017
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031-177.2.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting Site Characteristics of American Marten in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Martens exhibited strong structure-level selection, consistent with previous evidence that woody structures used by martens are larger in diameter than those otherwise available on the landscape (Martin and Barrett 1991, Raphael and Jones 1997, Sanders et al 2017, Tweedy et al 2019. Given marten ecology, our finding that rest structures were large and relatively uncommon is intuitive, yet the relevance of this is still worth considering.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Martens exhibited strong structure-level selection, consistent with previous evidence that woody structures used by martens are larger in diameter than those otherwise available on the landscape (Martin and Barrett 1991, Raphael and Jones 1997, Sanders et al 2017, Tweedy et al 2019. Given marten ecology, our finding that rest structures were large and relatively uncommon is intuitive, yet the relevance of this is still worth considering.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We grouped all used locations (female denning, female resting, and male resting) because our sample size was small for denning locations ( n = 26) and we assumed that individual female and male martens did not use locations differentially (Raphael and Jones 1997, Tweedy et al 2019). We compared fine‐scale forest features that we identified as potentially influential to marten denning or resting (Porter et al 2005, Godbout and Ouellet 2010, Sanders et al 2017, Tweedy et al 2019). Features included plot‐level woody structure counts (live tree, log, snag, and stump), average woody structure sizes, variation in woody structure sizes (standard deviation), percent shrub cover, and percent canopy cover.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, preservation and conservation of jack pine–red pine stands benefit wildlife species, particularly if applied at optimal locations. For example, American marten in the northern Lower Peninsula select for den sites in large DBH trees located in mature red pine plantations, which is unique to this population (Sanders et al, 2017 ). As Jack Pine–Red Pine forests are vulnerable to the effects of climate change (Table 1 ), loss of these habitats will likely result in demographic consequences for this isolated population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of license requirements, successful trappers are required to report the harvest location within a 1 square mile (2.6 km 2 ) quadrant. We supplemented these records with locations of resting sites and telemetry locations from research studies by the Little River Band of the Ottawa Indians (Sanders et al, 2017 ) and Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (Roloff et al, 2020 ), and citizen science observations obtained from GBIF ( https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.6zbg5c ) and eMammal (Cove et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%