Resting state functional connectivity associated with impaired proprioception post‐stroke

Abstract

Deficits in proprioception, the knowledge of limb position and movement in the absence of vision, occur in ~50% of all strokes; however, our lack of knowledge of the neurological mechanisms of these deficits diminishes the effectiveness of rehabilitation and prolongs recovery. We performed resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on stroke patients to determine functional brain networks that exhibited changes in connectivity in association with proprioception deficits determined by a Kinarm robotic exoskeleton assessment. Thirty stroke participants were assessed for proprioceptive impairments using a Kinarm robot and underwent resting‐state fMRI at 1 month post‐stroke. Age‐matched healthy control (n = 30) fMRI data were also examined and compared to stroke data in terms of the functional connectivity of brain regions associated with proprioception. Stroke patients exhibited reduced connectivity of the supplementary motor area and the supramarginal gyrus, relative to controls. Functional connectivity of these regions plus primary somatosensory cortex and parietal opercular area was significantly associated with proprioceptive function. The parietal lobe of the lesioned hemisphere is a significant node for proprioception after stroke. Assessment of functional connectivity of this region after stroke may assist with prognostication of recovery. This study also provides potential targets for therapeutic neurostimulation to aid in stroke recovery.

Epilepsy alters brain networks in patients with insular glioma

“…The strength of functional connections between brain regions, often referred to as functional connectivity, is a measure of the degree of synchrony. 32 In contrast to the observed differences in functional connectivity between glioma and GRE in the temporal and frontal lobes, no significant distinctions were identified in the context of insular glioma. Small‐world properties gauge the degree of integration and segregation in brain functions.…”

Is unilateral cerebellum sufficient? Insights from new cases of cerebellar agenesis and literature review

“…The increased GMV in the temporal lobe was mainly located in the parahippocampal, entorhinal, and fusiform areas, which are part of the limbic circuit and associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive abilities, and communication skills (Kolc et al ., 2019 ). Within the parietal lobe, regions showing increased GMV were mainly located in the inferior parietal, postcentral, and supramarginal areas, which play important roles in the arousal system (Jiang et al ., 2022 ), somatosensory processing and integration, coordination of upper limb movements (Kenzie et al ., 2024 ), and tactile categorization and decision-making (Lee et al ., 2023 ). GMV changes in these brain regions exhibited similarity between the two patients.…”