Restitutionary Remedies in the Contractual Context

Abstract

Contracting parties sometimes have a claim to recover money paid in advance, or for reasonable payment for work done under the contract, commonly described as restitutionary remedies. This claim arising out of a contract is nowadays generally regarded as a non-contractual, unjust enrichment claim governed by the modern law of unjust enrichment, by contrast with a contractual claim for damages or specific performance.

Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) no Arduino UNO R3: Uma Análise Prática

“…Uma proposta de implementação do protocolo CoAP na linguagem C é a biblioteca microcoap [Jaffey 2013], criada no MIT para utilização na plataforma Arduino Mega. A biblioteca não implementa todos os requisitos definidos na RFC 7252 [Shelby et al 2014], apenas os itens básicos do protocolo(GET/PUT/POST), com o objetivo de realizar testes de instalação e utilização do protocolo em um dispositivo com restrições de recursos.…”

Better thanFuller: A Two Interests Model of Remedies for Breach of Contract

“…In a recent paper, Professor Jaffey has added to the argument that the quantum meruit should be replaced by remedies on a contractual basis, especially in terms of recognising the reliance interest. Jaffey says all I would hope to say about the rival contractual and restitutionary elements of the quasi‐contractual remedies considered as a doctrinal question of liability. But on considering the implications of Jaffey's argument for the quantification of the quantum meruit , a most important point of difference between our arguments arises.…”