2021
DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20200000070006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restless Practices as Drivers of Purposive Institutional Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new practice joins the CPS bundle through the material arrangement it shares with them, including digital platforms themselves, artisans’ bodies, craft projects, computers, cameras, and other artefacts entailed in making posts to platforms. We regard platformance as a “restless practice”: a practice with a “telos of change” (Seidl et al, 2021) whose purpose is to amend markets in the face of platformization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This new practice joins the CPS bundle through the material arrangement it shares with them, including digital platforms themselves, artisans’ bodies, craft projects, computers, cameras, and other artefacts entailed in making posts to platforms. We regard platformance as a “restless practice”: a practice with a “telos of change” (Seidl et al, 2021) whose purpose is to amend markets in the face of platformization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engagement in platformance reflects prosumers’ perception that, to succeed in platform markets, one must “play the part”—or perform success. Platformance is a “restless practice”: a practice with a “telos of change” that aims to alter the field in which it is embedded (Seidl et al, 2021). We find that although platformance contributes to changing certain platform markets elements in ways that may help prosumers deal with platformization, it also increases prosumers’ platform dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though unintended consequences play a role in these studies, as when a practice breaks down, they are usually recognized at some point and become learning opportunities rather than a trigger of self-reinforcing dynamics (e.g., Jarzabkowski, Lé, & Balogun, 2019). Practice-based research therefore has a clear bias toward change processes that are largely intended, either because practitioners experience, reflect on, and react to breakdowns (Lok & de Rond, 2013) or because they strive for “restless change” (Seidl, Ohlson, & Whittington, 2021).…”
Section: Practice Theory Revisited: In Search Of Self-reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that entrepreneurship education constitutes a thriving international research field in which there is an incessant flow of diverse studies and research (Alshebami et al, 2022;Raza et al, 2021). However, there is a gap between academic contributions and achievements in the practice of entrepreneurship education (Crawford et al, 2022;Genus et al, 2021;Parisini, 2021;Seidl et al, 2021). It is even argued that, paradoxically, the traditional paradigm of entrepreneurship education harms precisely what it aspires to achieve: entrepreneurial competence and activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%