2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of bottomland hardwood forests across a treatment intensity gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommended initial planting density for bottomland hardwood forests ranges from 400 to 3,000 plants per hectare (SI Appendix, Table S2.4). For this study we used 730 seedlings per hectare as a base case (47), based on recommendations for ecological restoration of bottomland hardwood forests in this region (86).…”
Section: Case Study and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recommended initial planting density for bottomland hardwood forests ranges from 400 to 3,000 plants per hectare (SI Appendix, Table S2.4). For this study we used 730 seedlings per hectare as a base case (47), based on recommendations for ecological restoration of bottomland hardwood forests in this region (86).…”
Section: Case Study and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our high estimate uses Texas Forest Service estimates for hardwood seedling costs ($0.60 each) and per-acre costs for planting by wildland machine ($85) and double disking ($115) as recommended for this planting option (89). We assume hand and machine planting costs per acre are for commonly used planting densities like those reported in Stanturf et al (47,86), and scale these costs proportionally for higher planting density scenarios.…”
Section: Case Study and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On sites degraded by agriculture, plantations of fast-growing, early successional species provide a relatively quick pathway to restoration of ecological functions associated with forests and can produce a range of co-benefits typically not provided by conventional afforestation practices [59][60][61]. The quick development of forest cover can immediately initiate amelioration of soil degradation, reassembly of nutrient and water cycling processes, development of understory environments conducive to natural regeneration of native species, creation of habitat for native fauna, and generation of revenue for recouping the initial restoration investment.…”
Section: Forest Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential to provide multiple benefits and return income to the landowner quicker than conventional afforestation methods are key drivers of forest restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley where most land is privately owned [65]. Accordingly, research on the site was designed to encompass four afforestation methods that represent a range of restoration intensities from passive (natural recolonization) to intensive (eastern cottonwood-broadleaf interplanting) restoration [59]. This intensive practice builds upon the well-developed silviculture and management of eastern cottonwood plantations advancing this species as a nurse crop for slower growing broadleaf species.…”
Section: Forest Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%