1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90068-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
4

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth a post is utilized as a means to retain a core or foundation for final restorations (1)(2)(3). Custom-cast tapered post and core procedures have been traditionally used to restore endodontically treated teeth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth a post is utilized as a means to retain a core or foundation for final restorations (1)(2)(3). Custom-cast tapered post and core procedures have been traditionally used to restore endodontically treated teeth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors affecting the retention and stability of the post-core and crown restorations are location of fracture, state of remaining tooth structure, post design (preparation length and diameter), and cementing material and technique. 18,19 If the location of fracture reveals less than 2 mm of tooth structure present to receive the crown, then crown lengthening procedure or orthodontic forced eruption technique was performed. The histological process that accompanies the forced eruption procedure was first described in 1940.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…some authors assert that posts may interfere with the mechanical resistance of a root-treated tooth, leading to an increased risk of damage to the remaining tooth structure (Sornkul andStannard 1992, Akkayan andGülmez 2002). To date, there is no consensus about the ideal material or technique for restoring root-treated teeth (Hudis and Goldstein 1986, Creugers et al 1993, Ortega et al 2004). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%